The craziness continues
I don't think it would work very well. You would only have exhaust flow to turn the turbo during the exhaust stroke of that one cylinder... therefore your boost would come in bursts. Maybe you could tune the pipe lengths such that the bursts come in at the same time that the intake stroke begins... but I foresee that would be very difficult. And, since it doesn't have a continuous exhaust pressure to keep it spooled up, it would spin down between every exhaust stroke, and you'd waste a lot of energy just spooling the turbo back up on every cycle.
I just don't see that being a valuable exercise.
I just don't see that being a valuable exercise.
Originally Posted by Sideways,Aug 25 2004, 08:41 AM
Have you ever seen a one cylinder turbocharged engine? The exhaust may not run the turbo efficiently and it would have one terrible lag.
Kris
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
From: was in Boston; now in LA
Originally Posted by mxt_77,Aug 26 2004, 07:51 AM
Doesn't it also have 12 cylinders (as opposed to 4)?
nice car
Turbos run off gas pressure and the more pressure you have the bigger turbo you can use. That's why all the twin turbo guys go with single turbos when they start modding and making big power.
The 4 turbo idea is dumb.
The 4 turbo idea is dumb.
Originally Posted by DimaK321,Aug 25 2004, 06:08 AM
This is a follow up to another post...
What if you get ITBs and use 4 turbos (1 per ITB) in conjunction with custom headers and exhaust... make these run "independetly" and reinforce the engine internals to handle this stupidity...
What would happen? HP? tuning? cost involved?
Sorry... ITBs intrigue me
What if you get ITBs and use 4 turbos (1 per ITB) in conjunction with custom headers and exhaust... make these run "independetly" and reinforce the engine internals to handle this stupidity...
What would happen? HP? tuning? cost involved?
Sorry... ITBs intrigue me




