View Poll Results: Do you plan to SC?
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll
Do you plan to SC?
Actually, I haven't decided yet. I'm going to save up $5,000 (probably take me a while), and by then...I should know.
Advantages:
1. You can whoop the heck out of the M Roadsters now.
2. The SC doens't have any "lagging" effects to torque below 6K rpm.
Disadvantages:
1. This is my daily driver, I would like to keep the wear, tear, and abuse to a moderate level.
Advantages:
1. You can whoop the heck out of the M Roadsters now.
2. The SC doens't have any "lagging" effects to torque below 6K rpm.
Disadvantages:
1. This is my daily driver, I would like to keep the wear, tear, and abuse to a moderate level.
I would add "I'll think about forced induction when someone comes out with a cost effective programmable ECU that allows proper timing and fuel control"
But seriously, I'll probably stay NA. Seems a shame to spend all that money on a masterpiece of normally aspirated engine only to boost it. If I can pick up 20-30 hp from cams and some other tweaks I'll be happy.
UL
But seriously, I'll probably stay NA. Seems a shame to spend all that money on a masterpiece of normally aspirated engine only to boost it. If I can pick up 20-30 hp from cams and some other tweaks I'll be happy.
UL
Trending Topics
The car is certainly not lacking in the power dept, but if I had an extra $5,000 (which I don't) I would probably go for it. Five grand for another reliable 100hp sounds like a good deal to me!
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ultimate lurker
[B]I would add "I'll think about forced induction when someone comes out with a cost effective programmable ECU that allows proper timing and fuel control"
But seriously, I'll probably stay NA.
[B]I would add "I'll think about forced induction when someone comes out with a cost effective programmable ECU that allows proper timing and fuel control"
But seriously, I'll probably stay NA.






















