When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
For comparison, my Dad's '04 GTO with intake put down 264 and Eclipses/Talons with boost controllers, intakes, and exhausts were putting down in the 140's. These dynos notoriously read really low....lower than a Mustang which is already much lower than a Dynojet. I plan to toss my car on a Dynojet at the end of May so we'll see what that yields as a comparison.
Yeah like I said, Dyno Dynamics dynos read super low, just look at the comparison numbers I included. My Dad's GTO would be near (if not over) 300 on a Dynojet. I was glad to see my power curve though, I'm thinking either my tach reads fast or their dyno reads slow though bechause I had the tech revving my car to 9100-9200 rpm.
Add 15-17% to DD or Mustang numbers to get an estimate of Dynojet numbers. It's not exact, but it gives you an idea of the range a car should fall into.
You can't even really compare like this. Comparing a DD to a DJ will have far more inaccuracies than normal. Everyone should wait til you dyno on a DJ so at least we have the same machine to compare to.
Not to mention even if you do it on a DJ you are still in a guessing game when comparing to others because each machine reads differently.
I would say those look like good numbers now but I wouldn't be suprised if you go to a DJ and get 205-210. Try to dyno on the same day as a number of other S's if you truely want to compare.
Try to dyno on the same day as a number of other S's if you truely want to compare.
Yeah, I'm actually looking to toss my car on the Dynojet during a NSX dyno-day. They were nice enough to invite the local S2ker's too so I'm sure at least a few will get on the dyno for a comparison.
dyno'd today
