S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

F22C Turbo'ed (Dynoed)

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #41  
yosephs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Default

oh cool
think the kit and pretune would work with the 06 european S2000's? (AP1 with DBW)
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #42  
mattlikethat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Toronto Canada eh!
Default

Nice numbers...I bet that car is a blast to drive
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #43  
s2kshift9k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,367
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

i need turbo really bad!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #44  
Enthralled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

kinda low for a tubo setup, but it does have a nice tq curve.


may i ask how much it cost after everything was said and done?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #45  
AJ PwR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Tsukuba
Default

Originally Posted by yosephs2k,Jul 26 2007, 04:56 PM
oh cool
think the kit and pretune would work with the 06 european S2000's? (AP1 with DBW)
It should work but the only thing is, you might need to re-wire the TPS because of the DBW.

kinda low for a tubo setup, but it does have a nice tq curve.
If the car wasn't leaning out at 7500rpm, we should see higher numbers
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 05:17 PM
  #46  
r_duff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 1
From: socal
Default





320 WHP, and its carb legal, no tuning! AP1 FTW! Other than a sligtly better looking curve, i dont see how a turbo is better.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #47  
Silkky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #48  
leftyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 2
Default

OP's dynoplot is off a dynojet. It would roughly have the same numbers as yours if it was a Dynapack. I would love to have 200 lbs. torque at 5krpms, but the EMS is dang expensive.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 09:57 PM
  #49  
AJ PwR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Tsukuba
Default

I have driven SC and TC setup. Both are nice with the power that are making.
IMO, I would prefer more low rpm torque as for daily driver because I will not rev the hell out of it everyday
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 08:07 AM
  #50  
screaminyellow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, Cali'
Default

Originally Posted by AJ PwR,Jul 30 2007, 09:57 PM
I have driven SC and TC setup. Both are nice with the power that are making.
IMO, I would prefer more low rpm torque as for daily driver because I will not rev the hell out of it everyday
Amen to that my brotha!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 PM.