S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Floormat Problems

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 04:20 AM
  #11  
wirejock's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by gregstevens:
[B]Good question, Sparky. I often wonder why on God's green earh people feel like they need to slam the passenger door like Nolan Ryan's fast ball!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 04:28 AM
  #12  
reds2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: seattle
Default

Count my vote for the back in and swing feet method. My kid with the size 13 feet had major difficulty entering the car till I showed him this method. Egress is just the opposite, using the textured part of the sill to oneself to vertical.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 05:03 AM
  #13  
s2ktaxi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Look at it this way - the mat is a wear item and consider it disposable. The seat bolster is a much more expensive item, as is the OEM door to door carpeting. Buy an extra mat set.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 05:43 AM
  #14  
Laird's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

I have the Silver/Red combo. Several months ago, I bought the German 3 piece set...black with red piping and a red "S" on the cross member. First of all, the mat is of much higher quality than the carpet, The full coverage black with red piping really changed the look of the interior for the better. Breaks up all that faded looking red carpet. I stored the original factory mats for the future and agree with previous posts...buy the 3 piece, it will wear a long time and save you replacing the interior carpet. Cost of mats, about $100, the resulting improvement in looks, priceless.

LL
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 05:45 AM
  #15  
Zoinks's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: Irving
Default

In addition to passengers stepping on the crossmember, why do people insist on closing the door by pushing on the raised glass?

I guess I need to lower the windows before letting people out of the car.

Zoinks
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 09:12 AM
  #16  
Frank's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Middletown
Default

I remember Luis from Portugal resolved this problem by mounting a nicely chromed miniature fire extinguisher over the cross member. He claims it has completly solved the problem. Plus is looks good !!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 09:40 AM
  #17  
RU2KREDY's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: West Bend
Default

My wife did three things to the S2000 only once - and in this order

-Slammed the door (like Nolan Ryan's fastball)
-stepped all over the crossmember and had a ***** of a time getting in that way
- Used the window to close the door with the roof down

We talked about #'s 1&3, problem solved. I never had to tell her about #2 because it's inconvienent as hell to get in that way. She has to use the swivel method, especially with a skirt or dress on. When she has a skirt on I ALWAYS open her door for her and then close it as well, that way - sometimes I get a peek

Now the biggest problem is when I give people rides with the top down and they close the door with the window I always make sure it's down when they get in and have resorted to locking them out of using it - they have to ask for me to unlock it and then I get to remind them not to use the damn window to close the door!!

I also use the swivel method of getting in the car - and do often kick the speaker area of the door, but I think that area is more resiliant than the carpet. Besides, if I used the step in method I'm afraid I'd fall on my head - DOH!

Forgot one other benefit of the swivel method, it give me a chance to knock my shoes together to get off of the parking lot grunt so it doesn't end up inside the car. Try that using the step in method and I'd for sure be on my head!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2000 | 10:04 AM
  #18  
S2K_CLS's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Portland
Default

That was a very annoying trait about my 99 Vette... not that it wouldnt close, but people were used to closing big heavy doors. Well, the Vette had big, LIGHT doors (due to its composite materials), and you'd frequently get people slamming the door so hard, it sounded painful.

Actually, the Vette was the most air-tight car I'd ever owned. You literally had to open a door before closing the hatch, otherwise you had to slam the hatch shut.

slamming panels shut doesnt do anyone any good...

Originally posted by wirejock:
The reason they slam the door is for years American cars had door problems so most of us got used to slamming the doors. Sorry not trying to start a political debate here. JMHO


Reply
Old Feb 9, 2001 | 01:48 PM
  #19  
Mavic's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

Now I know you guys are nuts! LOL
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2001 | 01:25 AM
  #20  
lvs2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
From: Bedford
Default

I thought that's what the three-piece mats were for (protecting the crossmember carpet). I hate the door slamming as well, and have heatedly discussed this pnenomenon with my wife on more than one occasion. I've even had to fuss at her for slamming the trunk.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 AM.