S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Higher octane fuel

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 06:44 PM
  #11  
macr88's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Feb 20 2009, 08:39 PM
Lower octane fuel than recommended also = lower mpg - its not cost effective in the long run.
Why would you get lower mpg? I've noticed that as well..
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #12  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

If you use gas with an octane rating lower than recommended, the engine will retard the timing to prevent engine detonation. Basically, the car will make less horsepower and get worse gas mileage.

Think of it like this. If you have a 250 hp car that requires premium fuel (91-93 octane) and gets 25 mpg with it, if you use 87 or 89 octane fuel, you will get 240 hp and 22 mpg.

Many people think they are saving money by using a lower octane fuel, but the reality is, if gas is $3 a gallon for 87, you pay ~20
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #13  
r6elmo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

to the OP - do you get 93 Octane locally? If so you're lucky! California gets 91 octane, we used to get 92 years ago.

The local race fuel here I can get is 100 octane, not worthwhile in a street car. if you have a high compression engine and some advanced timing then the higher octane will be worth while.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #14  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Feb 20 2009, 08:27 PM
If you use gas with an octane rating lower than recommended, the engine will retard the timing to prevent engine detonation. Basically, the car will make less horsepower and get worse gas mileage.
I'm not sure that I agree.

The engine will only retard timing if it senses knock. I don't think you'd get knock at 5k rpms on the highway without significant load... even on 87 octane.

And the higher the amount of "octane," the less amount of freely combustable material, I thought. That's why it's less volatile and resists detonation.

So if you're not to the point of detonation and retardation... it would follow that you might get MORE mpg from lower octane gas... to a point.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:07 AM
  #15  
FearlessFife's Avatar
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,630
Likes: 51
From: Kansas City, MO
Default

[QUOTE=Saki GT,Feb 20 2009, 10:27 PM] If you use gas with an octane rating lower than recommended, the engine will retard the timing to prevent engine detonation. Basically, the car will make less horsepower and get worse gas mileage.

Think of it like this. If you have a 250 hp car that requires premium fuel (91-93 octane) and gets 25 mpg with it, if you use 87 or 89 octane fuel, you will get 240 hp and 22 mpg.

Many people think they are saving money by using a lower octane fuel, but the reality is, if gas is $3 a gallon for 87, you pay ~20
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #16  
jeggy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=CKit,Feb 20 2009, 05:03 PM]

I've wondered about running lower octane gas on a road trip where you're just sitting on the cruise control.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #17  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

I've alternated between 89 and 93 over my commute for a number of tankfuls to determine the impact on mpg. Zero detectable difference, it ranged between 26 and 30, average of 28 on either. I still go with 93 octane.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AXO 5
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
3
Jul 9, 2016 11:35 AM
PanteraKitty
S2000 Under The Hood
6
Oct 5, 2013 03:56 PM
s2kadrenalin
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
4
Mar 2, 2010 07:22 PM
s57_s2k
Middle East S2000 Owners
3
Feb 23, 2009 12:56 AM
bhav
S2000 Under The Hood
6
Apr 25, 2004 09:26 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 AM.