S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Hit the dyno today....

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-04-2006, 05:05 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
MitsukillinS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: VA Beach via South Jersey
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i thought about a cai due to the fact that the S only sees the street when its sunny out
Old 10-04-2006, 06:30 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Johnny Sack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: formerly versionJDM
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lotus7racer,Oct 4 2006, 05:15 PM
Yes! for sure I don't know what I am talking about, however I asked this question many times in different S2000 forums, none were able to come out to say "honestly" traditional hot rodding can attain 25hp in this car. I mean traditional, without replacing the pistons and camshaft or forced induction.
Again, if you replace your exhaust, air filter, ecu or whatever bolt on you want (within reasonable budget), can you harness 25hp ? If you will spend $3,000 to attain that 25hp, then don't even mention.
Can you say to everyone 25hp is attainable using common bolt on?
I love to hear 'yes' but I don't know if this is just a dream.
Other might dispute you, other might agree with you.


227.4RWHP/146.9RWTQ=
KN filter
custome 70mm headerback
vafc tuned very carefully


i dont know who started speading the lie that the S2K cant make NA power. there are MANY was to boost the hp from this motor. lets start by talking about the areas the DONT need help:

1.) Intake assembly. the stock intake is honestly one of the best desgined pieces on the whole car. it provides the best combo of low/mid/highend power. i've had six intakes on this car and none of them provided the best hp curve as the OEM system. get a drop in filter of your choice and call it a day.


2.) exhaust manifold. some may disagree, but its hard to beat the stock header. YES power can be made from a good aftermarket header, but like the intake, its hard to get the great power curve the oem header gives you. save you $ for a mugen/j's/amuse/ASM/BERK/Megan/ricks. headers make more power on FI setups too, so remember that.

now, lets talk hp. here are the areas THAT NEED HELP:

1.) exhaust system. the factory system is also very good, but not good enough. single exhuasts will always make more power than dual on the s2000. 60mm diameter is great for mid/low end hp/tq/ 70mm systems are GREAT for top and power. we're talking 10-15RWHP gains from 70mm exhuast systems. you dont believe 15 AT THE WHEELS from exhuast then do a quick search, its been proven many times. also the s2000 loves to have the cat-converter taken out. there is alot of back pressure cause by the cat. i saw 6whp from a test pipe alone.

2.) OEM ECU. the s2k is tuned very well for a production car. but not good enough. the s2000 runs pig rich. getting a EMS/Emanage/VAFC. do a search on VAFC and you'll see the gains. up to 13RWHP peak and sometimes 18RWHP between 8 and 9k.

if you wonder over to the JDM section and see the thread "i want 230rwhp na" you'll find that there are more than a few guys in the 220+ range with not to many bolt ons. couple guys are the on STOCK EXHAUST. best of luck to ya.
Old 10-04-2006, 07:01 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
darkfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: its back!
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hope you didnt pay him to tune your VAFC if all he did was adjust the VTEC crossover point..
Old 10-04-2006, 07:53 PM
  #24  
Registered User

 
afwfjustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by darkfx,Oct 4 2006, 10:01 PM
I hope you didnt pay him to tune your VAFC if all he did was adjust the VTEC crossover point..
That was a silly comment. Changing the VTEC engagement takes 1 minute and can be done WHILE you're driving.

Everyone that thinks that this car cannot make N/A power are the people that have been around for years and have seen people try all the Comptech exhausts and the bogus JDM ECUs and DC sports headers because that's all that was really available in 2002.

Yes, that crap doesn't make any power. But, if you don't keep up with the times and haven't learned about what's in the present, you shouldn't comment and discourage people from making wise N/A options that make power. I really wish I would've dyno'd before I started parting my car out so I could have posted a big "I told you so" to everyone. My car was just as quick as a supercharged S2000.
Old 10-04-2006, 07:57 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Johnny Sack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: formerly versionJDM
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by afwfjustin,Oct 4 2006, 08:53 PM
That was a silly comment. Changing the VTEC engagement takes 1 minute and can be done WHILE you're driving.
never do this^^^ i've almost killed myself twice fiddling with VTEC while on the HWY.
Old 10-05-2006, 03:40 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
lotus7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=versionJDM,Oct 4 2006, 09:30 PM]

227.4RWHP/146.9RWTQ=
KN filter
custome 70mm headerback
vafc tuned very carefully


i dont know who started speading the lie that the S2K cant make NA power.
Old 10-05-2006, 05:30 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
miken5678's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 240 rating is for fly wheel horsepower not rear wheel. There will always be drive train loss to the wheels

200 at the wheels is around 16% drive train loss which is pretty acceptable
Old 10-05-2006, 05:32 AM
  #28  
Registered User

 
PilotSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=lotus7racer,Oct 5 2006, 03:40 AM] I will stick with my explanation how the engineers were able to utilized or maximized power of this engine. Power lost basically deals with goverment safety & emission regulation.
To delete the catalytic to gain
Old 10-05-2006, 05:43 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
lotus7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PilotSi,Oct 5 2006, 08:32 AM
I think you are confusing flywheel hp and wheel horsewpower.

No! I am not confused. I said:

" am interested to see a bare S2000 engine dyno at the manufacturer's claimed 240hp"
No! I am not confused. I said:

" am interested to see a bare S2000 engine dyno at the manufacturer's claimed 240hp"
Old 10-05-2006, 05:47 AM
  #30  
Registered User

 
PilotSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lotus7racer,Oct 5 2006, 05:43 AM
No! I am not confused. I said:

" am interested to see a bare S2000 engine dyno at the manufacturer's claimed 240hp"
"Lets rounded up to 200hp as an average (stock form). To lose 40hp is darn pretty big horsepower. Could it be weight, emission or is it really 240hp claimed to begin with? "

Lets do some math --

Stock Honda S2000 engine - 240hp.
Most agreed upon % of parasitic lost of any RWD transmission - 15%
240 x .15 = 36hp loss to parasitic drivetrain loss.
240-36 = 204hp

That's exactly what S2000s make at the wheel hp. I'm not sure why you think 40hp is such a big loss.


Quick Reply: Hit the dyno today....



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM.