S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

How much of a difference does VSA make?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 09:04 AM
  #11  
GuthNW's Avatar
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 215
From: Oregon
Default

Typically, all other things being equal (condition, mileage, color, etc.), you'll see a bump up in price for each newer year model from 2000 to 2009. To me the bigger question when it comes to the '06+ cars is whether or not you personally are cool with DBW technology. If DBW appeals to you, then it would seem like VSA would be a nice bonus to have. If you are actually planning to daily one of these cars through all seasons then I'd recommend prioritizing those cars that come with the hard top over the other stuff.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 09:47 AM
  #12  
Car Analogy's Avatar
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,751
Likes: 1,856
Default

I doubt he's planning to drive an S through Canadian winters. I think his concerns about VSA and CA are related to shoulder season weather. Its easy for a nice day and nice weather report to turn cold and wet unexpectedly, and to be caught away from home.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 09:56 AM
  #13  
GuthNW's Avatar
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 215
From: Oregon
Default

His comment was "I'm looking at dailying the car through all seasons". My first car was a Triumph Spitfire and I drove it year-round in Illinois. So I'm taking the comment quite literally, lol.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 03:17 PM
  #14  
TheCanadian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GuthNW
His comment was "I'm looking at dailying the car through all seasons". My first car was a Triumph Spitfire and I drove it year-round in Illinois. So I'm taking the comment quite literally, lol.
It is definitely going to get snowed it
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 03:31 PM
  #15  
TheCanadian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not if its just me - but I cannot find the edit button. I actually prefer DBW systems - as such the 2006+ is appealing to me. Thanks for the replies everyone
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 03:48 PM
  #16  
Hfreak's Avatar
Community Organizer
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 155
From: Eastern Ontario
Default

Don't do it, the car is just too special to drive it year round up here in Canada. Get a beater if you are set on an S2000 or just get something more practical for our climate.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 08:42 PM
  #17  
GuthNW's Avatar
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 215
From: Oregon
Default

Cool man (quite literally in your case I suppose). Happy S2k hunting.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2018 | 11:52 AM
  #18  
riceball777's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 75
From: Los angeles
Default

remember that the 06+ have the horrible return less fuel system. They way i think the 04-05 ap2's are better. for anyone looking to go for real power and go boosted the 04-05 is the way to go. You you dont plan to go boosted the 06 cars a better.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2018 | 04:29 PM
  #19  
TVPincDoc's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 2
From: Livermore
Default

Originally Posted by TheCanadian
I've been looking at the market and it appears there is a nice jump from the AP2V1 --> AP2V2 (2006-7) cars.
I'm looking at dailying the car through all seasons, and I wouldn't mind the extra comfort of VSA. I'm also not a complete fool and have restraint when it comes to safe driving. I've had a NB miata for the part 3 years that hasn't given me any problems (no ABS either - although significantly less grunt than the S). The VSA in 2006+ cars isn't traction control correct - just stability assist?

What I'm trying to ask is: would VSA affect your decision if you had to do it all over again?
Aren't "traction control" and "stability assist" just different terms used by different manufacturers for pretty much the same thing? My BMW doesn't have traction control, it has "dynamic stability control". I also prefer the S2000 for dry days. It'seven fun in the wet, but the S2000 demands that you pay very close attention as it never intends to tell you something more than once.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2018 | 05:02 PM
  #20  
Car Analogy's Avatar
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,751
Likes: 1,856
Default

No, not the same. Traction Control tries to prevent you getting stuck in mud or snow (or from roasting your tires cause your engine is too big). Stability Control tries to keep you from sliding off the road.

One is for when you aren't moving but wish you were. The other is for when you are moving, but wish you were moving in a different direction.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:21 PM.