S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

i don't understand the s2000...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 4, 2001 | 09:22 AM
  #11  
Tox's Avatar
Tox
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: The wilds of
Default

I agree -- don't be upset by some of the slightly harsh tones of the comments.

But don't miss the important point being made -- if you're not sure why you want an S2000, then you need to test drive one some more and think about it. These cars are not for everyone, and we owners wouldn't have it any other way. There are lots of intelligent and reasonable people who wouldn't have this car on a plate!
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2001 | 09:29 AM
  #12  
Mike L's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda
Default

hpalmer --

I agree that dealers play a role -- but so does the Corporation when the dealers aren't doing their jobs! I went round and round with MULTIPLE dealers and with AoA -- it was the biggest clusterf%uck I have ever dealt with -- including VW!!!

So again, my opinion (I am entitled to that!) stands -- Audi's and AoA sucks!

And twinturboS comes onto S2000online knocking the performance of a car that many of us love -- yet he says he is getting one -- whatever...
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2001 | 09:47 AM
  #13  
Da Hapa's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 0
From: Dana Point, CA
Default

different strokes for different folks.

twinturbos, if i may be so bold as to offer a humble suggestion. this board has many like me that take great pride and satisfaction in their automobile. starting off on this board by sticking your finger in their eye is not the way to get a warm reception.

make observations, hell even make comments. but you must have known when you posted that your statements were going to ruffle feathers. what's the point?

if you truly prefer the "torquey" nature of the S4, then I am not sure that the S2000 is the car for you. it was not designed as a drag racer. it genius can be found in the way that it handles, brakes, and accelerates when already on the road and going.

the s4 is a cool ride (i especially like the avant) but by audi's own literature it is a sports sedan not a sports car. comparing it to the s2000 is like comparing a harley fat boy to a suzuki hayabusa. two awesome motorcycles but each with a different mission in life. they both can carry two folks and have huge engines, but you can't really compare the two.

just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2001 | 09:50 AM
  #14  
nibble's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,206
Likes: 15
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default

twinturboS, Don't do anything you may regret. If you are not sure, don't get it. If you want an answer, ask questions without downgrading what people love. I'd appreciate it if you understand this.

cheers,
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2001 | 09:55 AM
  #15  
pfb's Avatar
pfb
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
From: Boulder
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by hpalmer
[B]The S2000 is not the car to pick if somebody is most interested in stop light racing.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2001 | 10:05 AM
  #16  
shingles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land
Default

0-60 does not make a fast car... it's just one aspect of speed. You can take a turn fast, you can slow down fast, you can die fast from poor driving... who cares?

If I wanted a car just for 0-60, I wouldn't ahve bought the S2K....

anyways...

-Shing
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
suprmonky73
S2000 Talk
24
Oct 14, 2008 08:37 PM
s2kva
Car and Bike Talk
124
Sep 7, 2007 06:30 AM
dyhppy
Car and Bike Talk
51
May 8, 2007 05:46 PM
bigfecker
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
7
Apr 6, 2004 11:00 AM
steve_nz
S2000 Talk
11
Apr 5, 2001 09:31 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM.