S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

I'm torn between two s2000's.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 08:36 AM
  #11  
Ryan2949's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Default

These are possibly the best deals I've seen in the past 6 months around here. There are AP1's with over 120,000kms trying to be sold for 17-18,000 -.-'.

Trumpettitan: I'd take any colored s2000 with an all red interior over these two. I absolutely love the red interior. The s2000 is probably the only car I know of that looks good in every color it was manufactured in.

Also, if I do plan on doing a few mods. I'm considering a spoon n1 single exhaust or a J's 70RR(no emission laws here in Sudbury), a bunch of engine dress up mods(I like a clean looking engine bay), some wheels(this will take a while to decide) and maybe a few suspension mods, coilovers, strut bars, etcetc. I want a fun car, but don't need an insanely fast car.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 12:11 PM
  #12  
SinghS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Chino Hills/Bakers, California
Default

I would go with the NFR. It has lower miles and from the post it looks like it was probably well taken care of.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 03:46 PM
  #13  
Fredster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Default

If the soft top on the 00 is in good condition i would definitely go for the nfr, you can always replace it for one with the upgraded glass window. mileage is a concern for me so once again the nfr. and it's true, nfr's push an extra +20ponnies
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 06:01 PM
  #14  
neuronbob's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 14
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

Get the NFR. Lower miles, lower cost, replacement soft top with glass for the difference in price between the two cars.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 10:21 PM
  #15  
cys.eddie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: 626
Default

km? both of them are super low miles consider the year. 79000 km is around 40000 miles. I would get the spa one , just because the hardtop. But it's totally up to you man, i think 16.5 is fair for the spa. and 14.5 for the nfr.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 12:24 AM
  #16  
s2kPA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 1
Default

I would get the NFR.
100% stock
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 05:54 AM
  #17  
Ferrari812's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 4
Default

The NFR gets my vote. Can't beat a car that is bone stock, well-maintained and cared for.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 06:06 AM
  #18  
redlineracing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 865
Likes: 1
From: Carolinas
Default

NFR gets my vote.

\rlr
carolina
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011 | 06:28 AM
  #19  
Ryan2949's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Default

To everyone saying the NFR is bone stock, so is the Spa. I mean... The only modification are wheels and it comes with the stock wheels AND stock tires. I like the Spa color more than the NFR, BUT I do love a low mileage car. And regarding the pricing, you gotta remember S2000's went for 50k here in Canada and both of these are true Canadian cars. They would either laugh or not respond if I offered them 2-3 thousand less than their asking price.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 12:08 AM
  #20  
woodburn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 5
Default

What i mean is if you get the spa yellow one dont sell the hard top. But if the choice was mine i woulod get the NFR.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 AM.