S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

impressive s2k mpg!

Thread Tools
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 09:08 PM
  #31  
skkppy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 330
Likes: 1
From: SOCAL
Default

the f20/f22 deserves better than this.

Old May 18, 2012 | 09:23 PM
  #32  
GSteg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 893
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Danwolski
Might be a stupid question but why does blocking the radiator and increasing the heat increase mileage?
Because your engine will get up to operating temperature quicker. Engines aren't efficient when they are cold. Those who drive very short distances won't have enough time to warm up the engine properly, so blocking the grill is a cheap and effective. The problem is if you need to go somewhere far. I would do it for short trips, but not long ones. I live only 3 miles away from work so my car doesn't get warm enough and as a result, my mpg is crappy. I wouldn't do this mod though because there are times I want to drive far, but don't want mess around with the grill shield.
Old May 18, 2012 | 10:11 PM
  #33  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
Originally Posted by Danwolski' timestamp='1337399021' post='21711625
Might be a stupid question but why does blocking the radiator and increasing the heat increase mileage?
Because your engine will get up to operating temperature quicker. Engines aren't efficient when they are cold. Those who drive very short distances won't have enough time to warm up the engine properly, so blocking the grill is a cheap and effective. The problem is if you need to go somewhere far. I would do it for short trips, but not long ones. I live only 3 miles away from work so my car doesn't get warm enough and as a result, my mpg is crappy. I wouldn't do this mod though because there are times I want to drive far, but don't want mess around with the grill shield.
I thought it was for aerodynamic purposes....
Old May 18, 2012 | 10:35 PM
  #34  
GSteg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 893
Likes: 12
Default

It serves both purpose
Old May 19, 2012 | 05:27 AM
  #35  
GravyRobber's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by fernando.
If you want the best MPG and like to hypermile, get a diesel Golf.

Drive the S2000 like it was ment to be, or don't drive it at all.
REALLY?! So I can't drive my S to/from work unless I'm driving like Ayrton Senna on the streets?

To the point of the thread:

If I keep it under 70 on the highway, I can get 30-33, depending on other factors (temperature, road surface, altitude, etc...)
Old May 19, 2012 | 06:38 AM
  #36  
kpc06bb's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 6
From: Macon, GA
Default

Okay, this is an accomplishment, however, I think the point the detractors are making is that such a concern is completely contrary to the point of this car. I couldn't care less about my MPG. I bought this car for the thrill of driving it. That said, I rarely do the VTEC thing (about once a day, I'll go through a couple of shifts in the mid/high 7s). I typically shift right below that transition, but other drivers seem to think I'm thrashing it – if they only knew . The point made by the opposition is that this car was designed for spirited driving. We can't help feeling that one who transforms this machine into an MPG champ is depriving him(her)self of the joy this little mechanical wonder was engineered to deliver.

I don't give a toss about the rapid destruction of my rear tires either, and I certainly don't select them for the best possible fuel economy. I want grip and I want grip that gives itself up in a progressive manner. I don't care if that means higher rolling resistance. The car (referring to my CR) was delivered with a brilliant set of tires. They aren't cheap and they don't last very long, but I couldn't care less. Tires that yield longer life and higher MPGs wouldn't permit me to toss this vehicle around corners. It's a hell of a lot of fun to do. This thing was built to carve corners.

I understand that different people have different priorities. I'm a semi-retired, old fart who doesn't owe anyone a penny (one of the few upsides to being older). I appreciate that pecuniary limitations are practically ubiquitous these days, but I also think that there are better ways to achieve this objective – although, I doubt there is an alternative that would look as nice (while offering the pleasure a convertible provides). I guess I understand, but, in a way, I really don't.
Old May 19, 2012 | 07:13 AM
  #37  
dv55xc's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 838
Likes: 6
From: Los Angeles
Default

Somebody save that poor s2k!!!
Old May 19, 2012 | 09:36 AM
  #38  
TVPincDoc's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 2
From: Livermore
Default

I'm actually more impressed by his "co-efficient of drag" coming in at ZERO. That's rather impressive.
Old May 19, 2012 | 09:37 AM
  #39  
TVPincDoc's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 2
From: Livermore
Default

Originally Posted by fernando.
If you want the best MPG and like to hypermile, get a diesel Golf.

Drive the S2000 like it was ment to be, or don't drive it at all.

The proper way to treat this car is drive it like a rental. Anything less is missing the point.
Old May 19, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #40  
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 42
From: Windsor, CA
Default

I can't believe only one person in this thread actually read that page and noticed that he REMOVED the grill block because temps were too high. I know it's confusing because the pic shows it blocked, but he isn't running it that way.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 PM.