JDM power/torque specs for 2004
cdelena is right.. powerband is king... high peak numbers get attention, but as far as the track goes, midrange is king... As far as lowering the redline, this would make sense.. our engine already runs incredibly hot. With an overbore (or change of internals, I don't know which they did...), the engine will be burning at even more intense temps. I still don't know how HondaTwincam made that 2.3 keep the 9K redline without overheating, all I know is I want one
Then you'll pass the new s2 on the track...
Then you'll pass the new s2 on the track...
I imagine they stroked the engine to increase the displacement. The longer stroke would necessitate a lower peak engine speed. Mean piston speed is 2* peak engine speed * stroke.
Brake Mean Effective Pressure is all that matters not peak bhp. One must have power throughout the rpm band and the S2000 should be all the better IF the engine does not run roughly due to the increase in stroke at the higher engine speeds. Also, it would benefit from cam phasing as with the K20 Series engines.
Brake Mean Effective Pressure is all that matters not peak bhp. One must have power throughout the rpm band and the S2000 should be all the better IF the engine does not run roughly due to the increase in stroke at the higher engine speeds. Also, it would benefit from cam phasing as with the K20 Series engines.
It was posted here before that Japan will get both the F20C and the new 2.2l version of the S2000, sold side by side.
The big news for me is the OEM 17" tire sizes. This hopefully means I can finally upgrade to 17" wheels and not lose out on grip with OEM spec S-02's. Of course, time will tell, as with all else.
The big news for me is the OEM 17" tire sizes. This hopefully means I can finally upgrade to 17" wheels and not lose out on grip with OEM spec S-02's. Of course, time will tell, as with all else.
Originally posted by shockwave667
Hard to figure out what exactly those specs mean. Can anyone tell?
"
2003 S2000 (Japanese spec)
250hp at 8300rpm
22.2kg/m at 7500rpm
2004 S2000 (Japanese spec)
250hp at 8300rpm
22.2kg/m at 7500rpm
2004 S2000 2.2 (Japanese spec)
240hp at 7700rpm
22.5kg/m at 7000rpm
"
Hard to figure out what exactly those specs mean. Can anyone tell?
"
2003 S2000 (Japanese spec)
250hp at 8300rpm
22.2kg/m at 7500rpm
2004 S2000 (Japanese spec)
250hp at 8300rpm
22.2kg/m at 7500rpm
2004 S2000 2.2 (Japanese spec)
240hp at 7700rpm
22.5kg/m at 7000rpm
"
Sam
Is there any chance the 2004 S2000/S2200 would be "crippled" or have its specifications fictionalized for certification by the Ministry of Transportation?
Isn't there a "gentlemens' agreement" regarding a domestic market power output in Japan (I thought it was 280-ps but maybe it's 250-ps)? Anybody else have any knowledge of this?
My understanding was that output for high performance engines was ALWAYS understated when submitted for certification in Japan.
Isn't there a "gentlemens' agreement" regarding a domestic market power output in Japan (I thought it was 280-ps but maybe it's 250-ps)? Anybody else have any knowledge of this?
My understanding was that output for high performance engines was ALWAYS understated when submitted for certification in Japan.
Actually, the "gentlemans agreement" regarding motor output is no longer in force. The auto manufacturers are no longer bound by the hp cap and can post the actual hp numbers that the motor is making.
Originally posted by joe_s2k
im not going to diss the car until i pass it on the track!
im not going to diss the car until i pass it on the track!
Maybe Honda was so concerned at dominating the small Tsukuba track that they made everything for lower speeds
.
Originally posted by Christople
If Honda ruins this car by no serious updates like the NSX, I will leave S2ki.com for good.
If Honda ruins this car by no serious updates like the NSX, I will leave S2ki.com for good.




