S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

JDM power/torque specs for 2004

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 06:03 PM
  #11  
joe_s2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,821
Likes: 0
From: HouStook TX
Default

Originally posted by RazorV3
im not going to diss the car until i get to drive it.
im not going to diss the car until i pass it on the track!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #12  
VeilsideAP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

cdelena is right.. powerband is king... high peak numbers get attention, but as far as the track goes, midrange is king... As far as lowering the redline, this would make sense.. our engine already runs incredibly hot. With an overbore (or change of internals, I don't know which they did...), the engine will be burning at even more intense temps. I still don't know how HondaTwincam made that 2.3 keep the 9K redline without overheating, all I know is I want one Then you'll pass the new s2 on the track...
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 06:55 PM
  #13  
Chui's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in SE Michigan
Default

I imagine they stroked the engine to increase the displacement. The longer stroke would necessitate a lower peak engine speed. Mean piston speed is 2* peak engine speed * stroke.

Brake Mean Effective Pressure is all that matters not peak bhp. One must have power throughout the rpm band and the S2000 should be all the better IF the engine does not run roughly due to the increase in stroke at the higher engine speeds. Also, it would benefit from cam phasing as with the K20 Series engines.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #14  
S2kRob's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

It was posted here before that Japan will get both the F20C and the new 2.2l version of the S2000, sold side by side.

The big news for me is the OEM 17" tire sizes. This hopefully means I can finally upgrade to 17" wheels and not lose out on grip with OEM spec S-02's. Of course, time will tell, as with all else.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 08:20 PM
  #15  
BPUKiller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally posted by shockwave667
Hard to figure out what exactly those specs mean. Can anyone tell?

"
2003 S2000 (Japanese spec)

250hp at 8300rpm
22.2kg/m at 7500rpm
2004 S2000 (Japanese spec)

250hp at 8300rpm
22.2kg/m at 7500rpm
2004 S2000 2.2 (Japanese spec)

240hp at 7700rpm
22.5kg/m at 7000rpm

"
22.2 Kg/m*((2.2lbs/kg)*(3.1ft/m))=151ft*lbs plus change. Man not much torque still, however I hope the curve is smother and longer.

Sam
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 09:41 PM
  #16  
Christople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
From: Corn Country
Default

If Honda ruins this car by no serious updates like the NSX, I will leave S2ki.com for good.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 09:43 PM
  #17  
LATEOTT's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Is there any chance the 2004 S2000/S2200 would be "crippled" or have its specifications fictionalized for certification by the Ministry of Transportation?

Isn't there a "gentlemens' agreement" regarding a domestic market power output in Japan (I thought it was 280-ps but maybe it's 250-ps)? Anybody else have any knowledge of this?

My understanding was that output for high performance engines was ALWAYS understated when submitted for certification in Japan.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 10:16 PM
  #18  
DouglaS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 1
From: Santa Monica/West LA
Default

Actually, the "gentlemans agreement" regarding motor output is no longer in force. The auto manufacturers are no longer bound by the hp cap and can post the actual hp numbers that the motor is making.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 10:26 PM
  #19  
integrate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
From: Irvine
Default

Originally posted by joe_s2k

im not going to diss the car until i pass it on the track!
Bwahahha!!

Maybe Honda was so concerned at dominating the small Tsukuba track that they made everything for lower speeds .
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #20  
wickerbill's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally posted by Christople
If Honda ruins this car by no serious updates like the NSX, I will leave S2ki.com for good.
How can you ruin a car by not updating it? It still performs just as well as it always has if there were no updates. It may be surpassed by the competition, but that affect the performance of the current model. The NSX is still an amazing car, but it has been surpassed in many ways by the competition at that price point. That doesn't mean it's not a great car though, just maybe not the best for that price.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.