Let's Design The S3200
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Redlands
I know, it's a crazy idea, but you know it's coming. Let's just give Honda a heads-up on what we expect!
Our goal: What should the next generation of Honda's #2 sports car be? I say #2 because we can't forget the NSX. There are some things it can't be and still be the "S". Not mid-engine, not over $40K and not all aluminum skin - or it will be an NSX.
Our problem: If we get too close in price to the Vette we've got to have the grunt - and so far that's never been Honda! Our only chance is to out finesse them!
Now, OUR CAR: Let me start. I've called it the S3200 for obvious reasons - V6! Small, same technology as the 4, normally aspirated (so that it can be really made to go with after market SC/TC for those interested). Once again, it must be the most HP per CC in the business!
Our goal: What should the next generation of Honda's #2 sports car be? I say #2 because we can't forget the NSX. There are some things it can't be and still be the "S". Not mid-engine, not over $40K and not all aluminum skin - or it will be an NSX.
Our problem: If we get too close in price to the Vette we've got to have the grunt - and so far that's never been Honda! Our only chance is to out finesse them!
Now, OUR CAR: Let me start. I've called it the S3200 for obvious reasons - V6! Small, same technology as the 4, normally aspirated (so that it can be really made to go with after market SC/TC for those interested). Once again, it must be the most HP per CC in the business!
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
From: newport beach
I like the idea, but there is already a real question about the S2000's rear suspension and handling with 50/50 (25/25/25/25) balance. I think if you put a big V6 up front you'd upset the balance even more. Of course a 3.2 liter V6 with 120 HP/liter (384 HP) would be terrific. I just don't think the S2000 chassis could handle the increased weight up front.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne!
How many times do I have to tell you guys that the S3200 is a 4 NOT a 6.
Following the capacity increase of the 4 cylinder S500/600/800 series means we will logically have an S2000/2400/3200 range of 4 cylinder vehicles.
.... and don't forget the chain drive!!!!
Following the capacity increase of the 4 cylinder S500/600/800 series means we will logically have an S2000/2400/3200 range of 4 cylinder vehicles.
.... and don't forget the chain drive!!!!
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Screw the V6. V6s are for family sedans. INLINE 6 ALL THE WAY! 
Actually, I'd prefer it to remain an S2000, maybe an S2200/S2400. There's no way Honda could make a 3.2 V6 and keep the weight balance - the F20C is extremely light.
Actually, I'd prefer it to remain an S2000, maybe an S2200/S2400. There's no way Honda could make a 3.2 V6 and keep the weight balance - the F20C is extremely light.
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Wayne
You know what would be really sweet is a 2liter high reving in-line four cylinder engine. A slick shifting tranny and ridgid frame to allow for a stiff suspension and a total weight of a few hundred pounds lighter than the competition. Use a race bred suspension (double wishbone) front and rear and you'd have a smoken sweet car. Oh and if they could figure out a way to have two cams (one smooth and one screaming that would just kick ass)
I'd buy one for sure.
Hugh
I'd buy one for sure.
Hugh
