Let's Design The S3200
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Redlands
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know, it's a crazy idea, but you know it's coming. Let's just give Honda a heads-up on what we expect!
Our goal: What should the next generation of Honda's #2 sports car be? I say #2 because we can't forget the NSX. There are some things it can't be and still be the "S". Not mid-engine, not over $40K and not all aluminum skin - or it will be an NSX.
Our problem: If we get too close in price to the Vette we've got to have the grunt - and so far that's never been Honda! Our only chance is to out finesse them!
Now, OUR CAR: Let me start. I've called it the S3200 for obvious reasons - V6! Small, same technology as the 4, normally aspirated (so that it can be really made to go with after market SC/TC for those interested). Once again, it must be the most HP per CC in the business!
Our goal: What should the next generation of Honda's #2 sports car be? I say #2 because we can't forget the NSX. There are some things it can't be and still be the "S". Not mid-engine, not over $40K and not all aluminum skin - or it will be an NSX.
Our problem: If we get too close in price to the Vette we've got to have the grunt - and so far that's never been Honda! Our only chance is to out finesse them!
Now, OUR CAR: Let me start. I've called it the S3200 for obvious reasons - V6! Small, same technology as the 4, normally aspirated (so that it can be really made to go with after market SC/TC for those interested). Once again, it must be the most HP per CC in the business!
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lafayette
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
V6s are for family sedans.
Stick with I-4, but totally redesign the chassis. Make it weigh no more than 1500 lbs.
240 hp with only 1500 lbs to pull can be a lot of fun.
Stick with I-4, but totally redesign the chassis. Make it weigh no more than 1500 lbs.
240 hp with only 1500 lbs to pull can be a lot of fun.
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: newport beach
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the idea, but there is already a real question about the S2000's rear suspension and handling with 50/50 (25/25/25/25) balance. I think if you put a big V6 up front you'd upset the balance even more. Of course a 3.2 liter V6 with 120 HP/liter (384 HP) would be terrific. I just don't think the S2000 chassis could handle the increased weight up front.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne!
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How many times do I have to tell you guys that the S3200 is a 4 NOT a 6.
Following the capacity increase of the 4 cylinder S500/600/800 series means we will logically have an S2000/2400/3200 range of 4 cylinder vehicles.
.... and don't forget the chain drive!!!!
Following the capacity increase of the 4 cylinder S500/600/800 series means we will logically have an S2000/2400/3200 range of 4 cylinder vehicles.
.... and don't forget the chain drive!!!!
#5
Screw the V6. V6s are for family sedans. INLINE 6 ALL THE WAY!
Actually, I'd prefer it to remain an S2000, maybe an S2200/S2400. There's no way Honda could make a 3.2 V6 and keep the weight balance - the F20C is extremely light.
Actually, I'd prefer it to remain an S2000, maybe an S2200/S2400. There's no way Honda could make a 3.2 V6 and keep the weight balance - the F20C is extremely light.
Trending Topics
#8
You know what would be really sweet is a 2liter high reving in-line four cylinder engine. A slick shifting tranny and ridgid frame to allow for a stiff suspension and a total weight of a few hundred pounds lighter than the competition. Use a race bred suspension (double wishbone) front and rear and you'd have a smoken sweet car. Oh and if they could figure out a way to have two cams (one smooth and one screaming that would just kick ass)
I'd buy one for sure.
Hugh
I'd buy one for sure.
Hugh
#9
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kobe
[B]2999cc
[B]2999cc