S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Let's Design The S3200

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 15, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #51  
Chris_K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Default

I want a 2.4l twin turbo and about 2300lbs. ~350hp and ~390tq and 9k rpm redline, stock. That's right honda, get some more stroke in that engine AND keep the high revs. That would be a blast.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2011 | 11:51 AM
  #52  
TheSteel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Default

3.0 liter v8, 10k rpm with at least 350hp/300tq. 7 speed paddle shifted trans and similar weight to the ap1/2. I'd also want a tire size between 275-315 from the factory, and a small partnership with hankook or dunlop to get some good tires in those sizes at a low price much like we have now in our factory sizes. I'd be a happy guy with that.

Oh, and how about a little room for improvement on the factory motor. Not have it maxed out of the factory.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2011 | 08:34 PM
  #53  
LowFlyin''s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 299
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City
Default

Originally Posted by Fredster
forget all of your ideas, i say honda does a similar body design to what we have now pushed by one of these babies!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp4SV8FGZoo
Hell, I wouldn't even be that greedy. Just give me half of that and keep the revs.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2011 | 09:03 PM
  #54  
G's Avatar
G
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,100
Likes: 6
From: Maggie Valley, NC
Default

Hopefully Honda will stay away from 5 cyc. They tried that once back in the day - anyone remember the pile of crap Vigor?

5's are just strange to me - I want them to stay 4 or go with the true original idea of a small displacement I-6.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2011 | 09:33 PM
  #55  
B0neSt0ck's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by xedk
how does one find a 10 year old thread?
Lol,just was searching,title caught my attention!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2011 | 12:56 AM
  #56  
34witt's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Default

I would like to see a single head V-6. Something similar to the VR-6'd from VW. Compact size, good hp/tq, light weight, ect. Maybe a 3.0-3.2L with about 320-350 and at least 250ft/tq. If they actually do build this car I am guessing a J32 will end up in the front.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2011 | 01:04 AM
  #57  
NA1NSXR's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

Pretty much all of the above would make the existing car worse, forget even talking about hypothetical improvements for a successor....
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #58  
Angelfire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fl
Default

I noticed i was reading a ten year old thread at the end of page 1...

oh yeah, i dont have any requests for improvements to the S i love it as it is ^.^
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Saki GT
Car and Bike Talk
33
Jan 24, 2015 06:20 AM
Scot
Car and Bike Talk
41
Jan 27, 2013 08:49 PM
S2k03
Car and Bike Talk
32
Oct 13, 2005 10:42 AM
rai
Car and Bike Talk
37
Jun 26, 2003 05:47 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM.