Its amazing how similar these two cars really are, when compared to pretty much any other car, and how silly it is to argue which one is better. In a world with only apples, we're arguing which orange is better.

 

+1

 

100 years from now it won't matter at all.

 

AP2 is a better car, a AP1 is a better s2000


/thread

 

Agree.

 

What I find funny is how there was no mention of the CR? Maybe they didn't want to kick that hornets nest LOL. Or as a HPD Honda rep related to us in a conversation some years ago (and I am paraphrasing here) "The CR was basically a return to the set-up or rawness of the AP-1 with minor improvements in aero, suspension, stiffness etc ....The CR is essentially an AP-1.5" .... You should have seen the two CR drivers go apoplectic at that remark ;-) ... Priceless!

 

Yeah now if Honda would have done away with the cdv, and the ridiculously overweight flywheel, and retuned the ecu to give a proper lowered vtec engagement point, it would have been a winner right out of the box. But nooooo... there is nothing track oriented about a 22lb flywheel or 6k rpm vtec with a 8k rpm peak limit so you miss out on the smoothness and mid range improvement wile also dropping out of vtec between shifts. Not even the CR is 100% right out of the box.

 

Every S2000 owner has an opinion, but only one generation really is the best.

I can note, however, that every S2000 owner will agree that Curated Content needs to have thread privileges restricted.

 

Sure it will. My great, great, great grandson will still be driving my S2000.

 

I may have pointed to this 20 posts ago but nobody is hearing it???