S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

this might explain why do our cars hydroplane...

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 06:57 AM
  #11  
integrate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
From: Irvine
Default

my friend has a 2000 Camaro (base) and the thing hydroplanes way to easily. He even admits it, and he's a good driver. He has to go way slower than most cars on the road to stay straight.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 07:20 AM
  #12  
johnyboy32's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

In order to drive according to the road contions the driver has to be able to percieve and react to them...sometimes this is all but impossible. I'll give an example. Here in GA we get nasty things like black ice and because of the way the road are paved they get very oily after a light rain. In any case, sometimes you can't see let alone react to these things. So, if I am happily driving along at 65 on a bright sunny day and just happen to drive through an area where it rained 15 minutes ago hit a patch of oily road and spin out...who's fault is it really? No ones IMHO. Sometimes $h!t happens, but for some reason we have to blame someone for everything. Not everyone who has an accident is a bad driver...even the illustrious Micheal Schumacher has had a few wrecks.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 07:21 AM
  #13  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

integrate - my point exactly -

HE realizes that HE must go slower to avoid hydroplaning
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 07:31 AM
  #14  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

johnny,

yes, but, as you state, you are already AWARE of the possibility of oil, black ice etc. - so expect them and drive accordingly.

for example, when it rains, people naturally slow down - it's a fact. sometimes though, they just don't slow down enough.

anyways, enough about this - i am abviously in the minority here and can't seem to get anyone to see my FUNDAMENTAL point....
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 07:56 AM
  #15  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

I agree with what you're saying TKG. But there was an implication in the initial posts that hydroplaning was either a result of driver error (and only driver error) or a result of mismatched tires. Both of those statements are false. I was hoping to explain why a car would hydroplane, and why the S2000 (applies to almost all sports cars) seems to be particularly sensitive to it.

What I'm trying to convey is that a vehicle can hydroplane for many reasons, and how fast you're driving is only one of those reasons. It is a major factor - going 80 in a downpour is obviously pretty stupid, but I see people doing it anyway. And really, you can't always see a puddle - when driving at night or in a heavy downpour for example. So slowing down to 30 mph to avoid hydroplaning on a 55mph highway when you can't see anything but dry or slightly wet pavement? Come on. Using the logic of slowing down since there might be a road hazard such as water, black ice, loose gravel, oil slicks, etc means we'd all have to drive 15mph pretty much all the time. That'd be fun

There's a major difference between driver error and driver stupidity. The former doesn't cause accidents because of hydroplaning, the latter does.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 10:20 AM
  #16  
nEVERCLEAR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

I am on the side of driver error that is coupled with a light short wheel based car that has some what wide rear tires.

Anytime that you loose traction with perfectly good tires you were in error, or in error for not having good tires. I have been unable to stop on ice in another vehicle and slid into a snow bank in Lake Tahoe. I did not blame the rental car or the weather, I was not driving the vehicle in such a manner as to not slide into the snow bank.

But after saying that, it is a function of the vehicles handling characteristics that gets you sliding on water, another characteristic of the driver that keeps you, your car and others on the roadways safe after getting the car in that position.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 10:59 AM
  #17  
TXRacer's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Folks, please distinguish between "hydroplane" and "lose control of the vehicle". It is quite possible to do the former without doing the latter.

An S2k on S02's hydroplanes much more easily than other cars, period. With full tread, I could hydroplane at 40mph when all the cars around me (from yugos to semis) were doing 80+ without problems.

The problem is that (a) some drivers are not aware of this, and (b) most drivers cannot handle it when it happens.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 11:07 AM
  #18  
4Cars1Teenager's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Dunstable
Default

can't we all just get along?
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 11:35 AM
  #19  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

TXRacer - I tried making this point several times and it quite obviously failed.

Thanks for making my long-winded explanation(s) short and to the point
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2002 | 11:51 AM
  #20  
Phantom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by TXRacer
[B]Folks, please distinguish between "hydroplane" and "lose control of the vehicle".
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:20 AM.