N/A high HP
^^^
Thats impressive..
i wish my dyno looked like that. what exactly is he running.
also since no one said anything about this, don't forget a key to making your NA project quicker would be gears. won't change the HP, but for accleration, which you'll need, it will be more than useful.
Thats impressive..
i wish my dyno looked like that. what exactly is he running.
also since no one said anything about this, don't forget a key to making your NA project quicker would be gears. won't change the HP, but for accleration, which you'll need, it will be more than useful.
Originally Posted by Bass,Feb 22 2006, 09:02 AM
don't know too much about this stuff BUT here's Gs2k's dyno

notice how the torque is way higher even at 1500rpm. A highly tuned NA motor would probably make LESS torque at that range. This looks like a supercharged motor.
With higher compression it could be NA, the torque difference is maintained at a fairly consistent rate. With FI the difference would grow as the pressure rises. Is this flywheel horsepower or at the wheel? It says 2wd drive dyno but the axis are marked as flywheel.
that's not an FI dynograph. it looks like a higher compression n/a engine.
a supercharged motor would look MUCH different on this dyno, since the supercharger tends to increase the hp exponentially due to the higher rpm meaning higher speed of the SC.
a supercharged motor would look MUCH different on this dyno, since the supercharger tends to increase the hp exponentially due to the higher rpm meaning higher speed of the SC.
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Feb 22 2006, 08:19 AM
it's the rod angle caused by the change made to the crankshaft.
I thought it was the rods themselves that were created to be bigger.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ty.
Archived Member S2000 Classifieds and For Sale
43
Jul 6, 2007 07:08 PM
S(teve)2000
S2000 Forced Induction
10
Sep 4, 2005 02:31 PM




