S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

New Megan Header for the S2000!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #141  
mic_crispy's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,904
Likes: 3
From: Orlando, FL
Default

i think raspy is more like it... any header ive ever heard makes the car sound more raspy.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #142  
stena's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 10
From: Skopje
Default

A Sound or video clip from roaring Vtec would be great Filmed from opened hood?
Just a sample of what we are expecting?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #143  
RoaringVtec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

I'l get you a sample, lets see if my camera's recordgina abilities are any good.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #144  
stena's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 10
From: Skopje
Default

yea thats what i am talking about...
By the way..
If i get it right.You had ricks header before...
I know that BUTT dyno is a hard thing but have you seen any difference?
Performance whise?I took my Cat off and felt better acceleration on Vtec but that lasted a week or so when it came normal....
And in the end -comparison on subjective base between two?
And the dyno will tell a lot.
Stefce
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #145  
RoaringVtec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Ricks definitely gave more power, i never dynoed it but butt dyno said alot. Mid-range and top end i really feltt he improvement. The megan doesn't seem exactly like Rick's but rick added like 4-6 whp on their dyno, maybe megan's improvement (if any) is not as much.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #146  
Silver9k's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 6
From: DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by RoaringVtec,Jan 25 2006, 09:03 PM
Ricks definitely gave more power, i never dynoed it but butt dyno said alot. Mid-range and top end i really feltt he improvement. The megan doesn't seem exactly like Rick's but rick added like 4-6 whp on their dyno, maybe megan's improvement (if any) is not as much.
that sounds disappointing...

just look at the views this thread has, we have all be looking at every new post hoping for good gains. Knowing the gains of Ricks/Mugen and hearing that this feels like less doesn't give much hope.

Oh well, J's stays on top I guess
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:13 AM
  #147  
stena's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 10
From: Skopje
Default

Lets Keep the Hope Alive...
Only the Dyno would tell.Well lets hope for the best... Gain all over..But no Lost hp.
In my opinion the S needs Power Up to as it screams its way to top.
Mid power like the mugens or Ricks is good for track use I think.
You pull out of corners with mid Rpm and floor it on exit and that's where mid counts I think.
But for us Street racers Top is always welcome and we Squeeze every bit of Rpm Left and This means TOP power....
As far as gains I think on our cars which are 200whp stock 5 hp is very hard to notice...The only thing that makes us believe is the Sound deception of the Aftermarket installs.Louder- must be quicker.
But most products are improvements and Mind peace that its not stock
Anyway 5 hp is 5 hp. No matter how expensive it is or how cheap it is.
Lets keep the hope alive and see the dyno.If not us Megan will be disappointed also.we are the largest buying S2000 group and if this proves to be poop I think they will be left with lot of S2000 headers.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 07:04 AM
  #148  
jshimer23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 3
From: Phoenixville, PA
Default

well the design of this header doesn't look to be one which will increase the top end. a more free flowing 4-1 should do that. With this initial report, i'm kinda glad i got lazy and didn't pull the trigger. Final judgement will be reserved for after the dyno results. Thank you Roaringvtec, you're a good man
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:57 PM
  #149  
s2kv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Default

This is the email from megan company

That was a pretty strong email there. The dimensions of the engines
remained the same. Same blocks, same cylinder heads and bolt patterns. The
internals of the engine was all that changed, so the headers will work with
all the S2K's.
When we went through the designs of this header we started off with what we
knew. The basics of headers, equal length primaries, smooth bends/welds,
larger diameter primaries and collector and to keep the velocity up by
allowing the primaries to be straight for awhile before bending.
After we get it on the car and do a few tests, we tuned it to get the
power where we wanted. We weren't looking for peak numbers, we were aiming
more for a flatter torque curve. The S2000 already has high-end power, but
it suffers a lot in the mid-range. That's why we went with a Tri-Y design
over a simple 4-1.
I don't have the dyno graphs with me so I refuse to quote any numbers.
When people quote numbers it's usually under the perfect circumstances. It's
with below room temp intake, low-drag, low-altitude, and a cool engine bay...
so don't believe everything that you're told.
We also NEVER copy other companies and refine things. If that was the
case then there would be no research and development... in which I wouldn't
exsist.
-Steve Johnson

Research & Development - Megan Racing Inc.

"The One That Gets it Done."
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 05:44 PM
  #150  
VIC4UF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,790
Likes: 0
From: Davie
Default

^^Interesting. I might have to buy one. Did I see a group buy in here? Someone had the hook up.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:19 AM.