S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

NSX into a S2k

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
Rith00's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Dover
Default NSX into a S2k

Okay this is interesting, I'm wondering if anybody has explored the possiblity of putting a NSX engine (90-99) under the hood of a S2k. Or has anybody done it?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #2  
CrazyPhuD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 0
From: SF, California
Default

If I recall the going price for an NSX engine is about $20,000. What do you want the power for? FI is way cheaper. You'd only gain 50 HP, pre mods. Really expensive and not clear what you'd gain.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
sickestS2k00's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: vtec heaven
Default

i agree
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #4  
Jason00S2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Default

A 5.0 Ford would make more sense!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #5  
redsound's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Default

isnt the NSX engine essentially a FWD layout, why would you go through all the hassle of fabing up parts when you could just tune f20.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #6  
RazorV3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
Default

the f20c is what makes the s2000, it's pretty ridiculous to swap this motor out IMO.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #7  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

Originally posted by CrazyPhuD
You'd only gain 50 HP, pre mods.
Yes, but how much torque in the low range?

Not saying this is a good idea, and it certainly doesn't make economic sense, but I don't think it's just about the HP.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 22, 2004 | 09:24 PM
  #8  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,367
Likes: 428
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

This has come up several times before.

1st problem, The NSX engine is too wide, It will not fit
2nd problem, It rotates the wrong direction for any available RWD transmission. So you get to spend $ on backwards ground camshafts, and reverse wound starter. This would cost more than the engine.
3. you would also have a few more problems, like the throttle body at the wrong end of the intake manifold, to small of a radiator, building motor mounts, finding a transmission that would fit inside the S's trans tunnel, and take the abuse of the C35B. On top of the S's weak diff with a 4cylinder, This is not a good idea.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #9  
JL9000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 0
Default

C32 spins in the wrong direction for our cars.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #10  
CrazyPhuD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 0
From: SF, California
Default

Yeah...I agree part of the fun of this car is the engine replacing it for another one(even another VTEC) would take some of the fun out of it. Even if you could width is going to be a huge problem. Probably every V8 would be to wide and alot of other engines too.

Now if you have a good 20-30000 just burning a hole in your pocket and want to try to get some mad performance, here's a crazier idea. I believe the engine compartment is long enough to fit a second f20/f22 in it, with maybe some adjustments to the radiator and the hood.

Now to mate the two engines and mount the second one is probably going to be a technical nightmare but since an f20c costs around 5500, you'll have 15-25000 to spend to figure out the details. Not even remotely claiming this would be practical or cheap but if you could make it work the stats would be sick, i.e. 8 cylinder, 480HP, 9K redline
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:05 AM.