Premium Fuel Necessary?
As an incredibly unscientific experiment, I put 87 in my Scion Tc on my way up north and 93 on my way back down. I believe the trips were comparable as far as distance, speed, temp, etc... On the way up (87) I averaged 24mpg and on the way back (93) I averaged 28 mpg.
4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.
Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.
Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
the gas mileage you lose and it still seems like you would put slightly more wear on your engine since it would detect the knock THEN correct the timing...would negate you saving 20 cents per gallon. sounds like the 20 cents more per gallon is worth spending. I don't like it much either, but it just comes with the territory. You bought a car that run on 91+ octane. :/
Originally Posted by DJRobNM,Jul 18 2005, 11:27 AM
As an incredibly unscientific experiment, I put 87 in my Scion Tc on my way up north and 93 on my way back down. I believe the trips were comparable as far as distance, speed, temp, etc... On the way up (87) I averaged 24mpg and on the way back (93) I averaged 28 mpg.
4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.
Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.
Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
Craig
my understanding from someone that worked at ChevronTexaco was that all fuels are the same (unless it's walmart gas or something), but the difference were the additives. I guess you are talking about performance and more engine health at that point?
I say stick with the manual suggested 91+ octane.
I say stick with the manual suggested 91+ octane.
i use whatever's recommended by manufacturer:
i.e.
- lawnmower - 87 *
- accord - 87, 89 *
- s2000 - 93
- 911 - 93 *
- ferrari - whatever *
i stop thinking about saving few bucks, rather i think about making more bucks so that i can upgrade to ferrari.
* i don't own currently.
i.e.
- lawnmower - 87 *
- accord - 87, 89 *
- s2000 - 93
- 911 - 93 *
- ferrari - whatever *
i stop thinking about saving few bucks, rather i think about making more bucks so that i can upgrade to ferrari.
* i don't own currently.
Originally Posted by Cyclon36,Jul 18 2005, 06:35 AM
If you can afford to properly maintain an S (i.e. tires, oil, etc), you can afford to put in decent quality gas. Don't skimp on a nice car. This isn't a civic.
Originally Posted by mooky928,Jul 18 2005, 11:45 AM
cyclon...thats right it isnt a civic...the beauty of the civic is that it gets 34mpg around town on 87. Just bc its less expensive does not mean its not good.




