S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Premium Fuel Necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 07:15 AM
  #11  
S2000RAT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: NEW YORK
Default

If you want to be cheap, you should of bought a Civic.


For real it's $3.00 diff.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 07:27 AM
  #12  
DJRobNM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Royal Oak
Default

As an incredibly unscientific experiment, I put 87 in my Scion Tc on my way up north and 93 on my way back down. I believe the trips were comparable as far as distance, speed, temp, etc... On the way up (87) I averaged 24mpg and on the way back (93) I averaged 28 mpg.

4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.

Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 07:41 AM
  #13  
EssTooKayTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,349
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

the gas mileage you lose and it still seems like you would put slightly more wear on your engine since it would detect the knock THEN correct the timing...would negate you saving 20 cents per gallon. sounds like the 20 cents more per gallon is worth spending. I don't like it much either, but it just comes with the territory. You bought a car that run on 91+ octane. :/
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 07:45 AM
  #14  
JAXrsx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by DJRobNM,Jul 18 2005, 11:27 AM
As an incredibly unscientific experiment, I put 87 in my Scion Tc on my way up north and 93 on my way back down. I believe the trips were comparable as far as distance, speed, temp, etc... On the way up (87) I averaged 24mpg and on the way back (93) I averaged 28 mpg.

4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.

Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
Did you use the same brand of gas on both fill ups? I think that due to manufacturers using different additives that using two different brands of gas may have more impact than using two different octanes on your car (assuming the TC only requires 87).

Craig
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 07:48 AM
  #15  
EssTooKayTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,349
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

my understanding from someone that worked at ChevronTexaco was that all fuels are the same (unless it's walmart gas or something), but the difference were the additives. I guess you are talking about performance and more engine health at that point?
I say stick with the manual suggested 91+ octane.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 08:21 AM
  #16  
S2000RAT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: NEW YORK
Default

All 87 Oct. gas comes from the same place.

The diff. is how much additives are injected.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 08:40 AM
  #17  
2cents's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Prospect Hts., IL
Default

i use whatever's recommended by manufacturer:

i.e.
- lawnmower - 87 *
- accord - 87, 89 *
- s2000 - 93
- 911 - 93 *
- ferrari - whatever *

i stop thinking about saving few bucks, rather i think about making more bucks so that i can upgrade to ferrari.

* i don't own currently.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #18  
mooky928's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Wilton
Default

Originally Posted by Cyclon36,Jul 18 2005, 06:35 AM
If you can afford to properly maintain an S (i.e. tires, oil, etc), you can afford to put in decent quality gas. Don't skimp on a nice car. This isn't a civic.
cyclon...thats right it isnt a civic...the beauty of the civic is that it gets 34mpg around town on 87. Just bc its less expensive does not mean its not good.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #19  
Silver_S2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo, Mississippi
Default

Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #20  
Cyclon36's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by mooky928,Jul 18 2005, 11:45 AM
cyclon...thats right it isnt a civic...the beauty of the civic is that it gets 34mpg around town on 87. Just bc its less expensive does not mean its not good.
Didn't say it wasn't as good. The civic is a great car, it's just that it's less sensitive to these things and 5 years later, it will probably less of an issue if you ran cheapo gas in a civic than if you did in our cars.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 AM.