Premium Fuel Necessary?
Originally Posted by DJRobNM,Jul 18 2005, 07:27 AM
As an incredibly unscientific experiment, I put 87 in my Scion Tc on my way up north and 93 on my way back down. I believe the trips were comparable as far as distance, speed, temp, etc... On the way up (87) I averaged 24mpg and on the way back (93) I averaged 28 mpg.
4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.
Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
4mpg difference * 13g = 52 extra miles = ~2g of gas so I actually saved money buying premium in a car the doesn't even require it.
Like someone above said, its two bucks people!!! I wonder how much money gas companies could save if they only carried premium. Probably enough to charge as much as the regular.
Originally Posted by vAnt,Jul 18 2005, 01:19 PM
Putting higher octane in cars that don't need it is pretty much useless (Modern cars that is).
That applies to the tC also.
That applies to the tC also.
The main thing is the ECU. There is a chance that your car can benefit from premium, especially if it's a newer car. Research showed that just like ECU's that retard timing to make up for detonation, some ECU will advance timing to make up for higher octane fuels giving the engine more power. Of course this was not the case in all cars and especially not in the older ones. However, some newer cars did see improved performance numbers with higher octane. It just depends on their ECU.
Originally Posted by FO2K,Jul 18 2005, 12:11 PM





