Premium vs. Regular

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Mar 22, 2007 | 05:15 PM

#101

Jason B

Registered User

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 2,610

Likes: 0

From: USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by xviper' date='Mar 14 2005, 08:34 AM

Dremel.

You should always run what the manufacturer recommends. For the S2000 Honda recommends 91 octane, so that's what you should run.

If you are low on money and running out of gas, sure, you can put 87 in and it won't hurt anything. to get the performance and the 240 HP Honda claims, you need to run what they recommend.

Now, for cars that call to run 87, and putting in 91, now that's different, since it calls for 87.

Mar 23, 2007 | 05:55 AM

#102

BAJZ

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 17

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sabre' date='Mar 22 2007, 11:12 AM

Huh??

They didnt make a Turbo celica in 2000.

If there was a turbo involved, I'd expect the HP increase is purely related to the ability to increase boost.

SORRY YOU'RE RIGHT MEANT (1990)

Mar 23, 2007 | 06:04 AM

#103

GOS2K007

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 1,332

Likes: 0

If you can't afford the extra couple dollars it costs to put in 91+ then you shouldn't be driving a S2000.

Mar 23, 2007 | 10:29 AM

#104

scoobysnax

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 234

Likes: 0

From: nova

i don't even like going to arco. and arco's 91 octane is like chevron's 87.

poor arco, get's dissed on so much. they don't take credit, those bastards.