S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Rate my Racey Street Alignment!

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 07:54 AM
  #1  
kasher_khan's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 263
Likes: 11
Default Rate my Racey Street Alignment!

So I have a stock 2005 car. Running Stock 17s with Pilot Super Sports in stock 215/245. Car has 45K miles and no changes to suspension (or anything else).

I had a Racing shop (that specializes in S2000) in do my alignment. I told them I wanted street alignment that was slightly more aggressive than stock. I ended up with the below. I was perfectly happy with stock specs but decided to try something slightly different. From my own diving impressions after a week on daily commute (long straight two lane highways punctuated by a few high speed twisties ) is that the return to center is very strong. Steering feels heavier than I recall and also it fights me slightly on heavily crowned road sections. The turn in is a bit dead and not as quick as I remember in slow corner or 90 degree turns. I don't think I like that part. I am guess all of these characteristics are due to more negative camber in front and rear compared to stock. What I do like is that in high speed turns (50+ mph) the car does have noticeably more grip. To the point where I am afraid to push it harder because it seems that the car just keep gripping all the way to 9/10. Car also feels more stable planted at high speeds. Is this something that I have to compromise on i.e high speed stability in turns vs turn in rotation at low speed?

I don't track so I don't know how to interpret the finer balance nuances. Its more about getting used to it. It seems the ?"slight" tweaking has definitely changed the character of the car. I have not yet made up my mind about whether I prefer this over stock. That's why I would like to get some feedback from the experts here to see what you guys think of the "custom" alignment and if my observations are correct.

Should I be concerned about tire wear with these specs? Is rear Tow too much?

Also can anyone post the stock specs for AP2 in the same units as below. I am having a hard time changing units online.

Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 08:02 AM
  #2  
noodels's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,331
Likes: 615
From: Norfolk UK
Default

Only thing I would change is rear toe,ie closer to minimum
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 11:08 AM
  #3  
engifineer's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 7,918
Likes: 2,485
Default

The heavier steering is likely due to the high caster setting. This is not a bad thing since increased caster adds dynamic camber (aka more camber when turning). Increasing the caster will also allow a tad bit more camber if I recall as well.

If it were an AP1, that rear toe would not be bad (I would have kept it closer to 0.1) since it helps a little with the toe curve which is part of the snappyness of the AP1. For an AP2 I would think you would stay closer to 0, but AP2 owners will likely chime in on that.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 11:09 AM
  #4  
Scigheras's Avatar
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 612
Likes: 121
From: the Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by kasher_khan
From my own diving impressions after a week on daily commute (long straight two lane highways punctuated by a few high speed twisties ) is that the return to center is very strong. Steering feels heavier than I recall and also it fights me slightly on heavily crowned road sections. The turn in is a bit dead and not as quick as I remember in slow corner or 90 degree turns. I don't think I like that part. I am guess all of these characteristics are due to more negative camber in front and rear compared to stock.
This is probably caused by your increased caster, not camber.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 12:27 PM
  #5  
kasher_khan's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 263
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Scigheras
This is probably caused by your increased caster, not camber.
everyone in the forums is usually going on about maximizing caster and that it is a "good" thing... Why is that? what is stock caster
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
Scigheras's Avatar
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 612
Likes: 121
From: the Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by kasher_khan
everyone in the forums is usually going on about maximizing caster and that it is a "good" thing... Why is that? what is stock caster
The things you describe "stronger return to center", "heavier steering", and "number turn-in" are all associated with increased caster.
The first two are in my opinion improvements, and probably in the eyes of a lot of other s2ki members too. I liked this change when I increased my caster to 7 degrees. Stock is 6 degrees.
Also you will gain more dynamic camber with increased caster.
However everyone is different and it seems like you just happen to not like it.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 01:00 PM
  #7  
kasher_khan's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 263
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Scigheras
This is probably caused by your increased caster, not camber.
How aggressive is this setup. I can go back to the shop for a re-do if I decide but my main concern at this point is to make sure I am not going to get significant tire wear.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 9, 2018 | 01:27 PM
  #8  
engifineer's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 7,918
Likes: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by kasher_khan
How aggressive is this setup. I can go back to the shop for a re-do if I decide but my main concern at this point is to make sure I am not going to get significant tire wear.
It is not overly aggressive at all. The first couple of years I owned mine I put about 7,000 miles per year on it plus 10 autocross events and 2 practice events (30 or so runs per event) , running -2.5 degrees of camber all the way around. I still got a season out of a set of tires doing that.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 02:28 PM
  #9  
rpg51's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,296
Likes: 260
From: Vermont
Default

If tire wear is the issue my recommendation is to put rear toe and the minimum oem spec and to put front camber at -0.5 and rear camber at -1.5. This is what I am at, and it seems great for my lively street only driving.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 08:08 PM
  #10  
Jub's Avatar
Jub
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 451
Default

I like it overall. I'd rather have a bit less toe in the rear. I have tried .35 degrees total on the AP2 and .1 degree total toe in. I liked the higher end better but would probably want to be around .2 degrees total ideally. You likely do not "need" that much camber for just street driving. Camber may cause some tire wear but toe causes significantly more.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 AM.