Car magazine is biased towards European makes. In a recent test between the Audi TT and the S2000, they picked the Audi. The reasons they picked the Audi made sense within the framework of the test, but that's just it--all head-to-head tests with the S2000 seem biased toward the competition. What sense is there in rating the S2000 in the areas of comfort or how it handles in the rain? It doesn't, but Car continues to persist in such oddball comparisons. Why can't they review for what it is? It's a streetable race car that's fun to drive and relatively cheap to own. I can't wait to see what's next--perhaps a comparison against a Land Rover in an offroad excursion.

[This message has been edited by S2KALI (edited November 04, 2000).]

 

I dunno... I have come REAL close to spinning out that rear end several times. It is a pretty discomforting feeling when the rear starts to slide, and I don't want to feel the 360 spin when it gives out totally.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by GTRPower:
[B]Hey Meat-

I think the S2000 is a hoot to drive- but it isn't the fastest car on

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by GTRPower:
[B]Hey Meat-

I think the S2000 is a hoot to drive- but it isn't the fastest car on