S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 makes Forbes Top 20.......

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #1  
MULDER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,936
Likes: 12
From: Charleston
Default S2000 makes Forbes Top 20.......

... its a sad day when the S is grouped with a Ford Ranger, Buick Rendevouz, and Kia Rio....

Link 1

Full article
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:12 AM
  #2  
eisenfaust's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

Funny that they call it dangerous, then put this text with it:

"The high-performance S2000 convertible has stellar handling and accident avoidance, and gets a surprisingly good five-star rating in NHTSA's side-impact test, plus a top five-star mark for rollover risk. But side airbags aren't at all available on the little, low-riding roadster. "

So if it doesnt have side airbags, its unsafe.

Dont the 07s have side bags?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
Silkky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

No side airbags here.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:17 AM
  #4  
Project22a's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default

I'd like to think it's an almost decent day for the s2k. Almost half of the vehicles there are trucks and suv's; and they're ranked worse on the list than the s2k. You'd think that being in a large 4,000lb mass would be safer than being in a 2800lb convertible.

EDIT: Why aren't any other roadsters on the list? The s2k is maxed out on ratings, so what about the the Miata, Solstice, Z4, ect... are they 5 star as well?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #5  
619Nick06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Meh, only thing was side air bags...
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #6  
Chrisbert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Liberty Hill, TX (Austin)
Default

Great, my little Mazda B4000 truckster is #2. I'm screwed.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #7  
MULDER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,936
Likes: 12
From: Charleston
Default

Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #8  
highwaystardoritos's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,199
Likes: 14
From: Melbourne, FL
Default

has anyone heard of anyone dying in a car crash in the S2000?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #9  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Yes, but it involved high speeds.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #10  
IheartS2ks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eisenfaust,Jul 27 2007, 10:12 AM
Funny that they call it dangerous, then put this text with it:

"The high-performance S2000 convertible has stellar handling and accident avoidance, and gets a surprisingly good five-star rating in NHTSA's side-impact test, plus a top five-star mark for rollover risk. But side airbags aren't at all available on the little, low-riding roadster. "

So if it doesnt have side airbags, its unsafe.

Dont the 07s have side bags?


I wish they'd put the reason WHY IT WAS DANGEROUS.

5 star rollover and SIDE IMPACT!

I could see if it was the demographic of drivers, but (like the 350z) that's not the car's fault.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:20 PM.