I was not sure if this had been posted already or not so here it is:

http://www.edmunds.com/roadtests/compariso...65/page014.html

Kirk

 

I find this interesting:

"Furthermore, the S2000 is not likely to inspire envy or get you some action at the club. Choose the BMW or Porsche for that. But if you're looking for a serious car that's serious about performance, search no further than the awesome but austere Honda S2000. "

I tell you what, that could not be further from the truth...

Atleast the yellow stook grabs a LOT of attention. There are so many TT coupes and Z3's around here that peopel generaly don't take a second look.

-Shing

 

Thanks for the heads up. To me, the "Evaluation - Drive" page says it all

 

Quote:"The VTEC is like a light switch -- no power, click, holy smoke power!"/ That is one way of looking at it.

Quote: Added torque, we all agreed, would make it perfect. "Fun to drive fast, but rather docile when driven slow," was the logbook quote that summed it up best./ Looks like they need to get a Mugen ECU/Headers and P-flow TB!

Quote: Plus, sound quality was found to be abysmal./ Very very true!

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by shingles
[B]I find this interesting:

"Furthermore, the S2000 is not likely to inspire envy or get you some action at the club. Choose the BMW or Porsche for that. But if you're looking for a serious car that's serious about performance, search no further than the awesome but austere Honda S2000. "

I tell you what, that could not be further from the truth...

Atleast the yellow stook grabs a LOT of attention.

 

Nothing beats Thorazine + 9,000RPM.

After I'm lobotomized, I'll get the Benz.