S2000 Quality
Who has concrete evidence that an Merc or Volvo is worse off then an S2000?
Mercedes & Volvo literally defined safety innovations in the late 70s early 80s. Mercedes came out with the Airbags, and Volvo were the ones that developed crush zones (that's why they were so boxy).
There is no way an S2000 would be safer then a Mercedes or a Volvo. Especially with a cloth top.
I'm glad those guys came out unhurt - but those flips disintegrated the energy of the impact. If it wasn't for those flips, I'm not sure how "Ok" they would've been. However, the same applies to any Merc/Volvo/Anycar. It's much harder to survive a direct impact w/o some way of getting rid of/absorbing that inertia.
Mercedes & Volvo literally defined safety innovations in the late 70s early 80s. Mercedes came out with the Airbags, and Volvo were the ones that developed crush zones (that's why they were so boxy).
There is no way an S2000 would be safer then a Mercedes or a Volvo. Especially with a cloth top.
I'm glad those guys came out unhurt - but those flips disintegrated the energy of the impact. If it wasn't for those flips, I'm not sure how "Ok" they would've been. However, the same applies to any Merc/Volvo/Anycar. It's much harder to survive a direct impact w/o some way of getting rid of/absorbing that inertia.
Originally Posted by hpark,Jan 16 2006, 12:24 AM
i know the S2000 does well in crashes relative to other light, small vehicles....but really crashing head on at 95 mph!!!! God really was watching over him that day.
I have been hoping that this would be a different winter than last. I remember many posts about wrecked S's last year. I have been happy that there have not been stories yet, until today. Hopefully this is a freak accident and not a sign of things to come. Everyone stay safe, drive safe. Yes our car is a beast for such a small car (I too have unfortunately proved it to myself), but lets not test it out!!!!!
crazy story. when you said it hit the guardrail head on, did you mean the car was also heading in that direction? Forgive my crude diagram but what kind of angle did the car hit relative to its velocity vector?
Nasty accident, but like I said, both seemed aware of what just happened, and there were no apparent injuries at all.
With regard to the Honda vs. Merc/Volvo, the thing that SAVED this accident was that when the S2000 hit the guard rail, the low center of gravity caused it to spin instead of flip. I have seen an S500 hit almost exactly like this, but when it rotated 90* to its direction of travel, the dampers compressed and the car just flipped like 5-6 times, instead of rotating in a 360.
If these individuals were in any sort of SUV, they would have jumped the guardrail and would have flipped into the woods at 95. Neither would have likely survived. Like I said, the interior was in PRISTINE condition. The only way you would know the accident occured would be the deployed air bags. The rear end was F*cked up, and the frame was definitely pretty bent (drivers door would not open at all).
They were driving pretty fast, but well within the limits of the car given the road and weather conditions (as well as traffic). The only car for several hundred meters was the SUV that hit them. I think the SUV just did not look. The S2000 driver did an amazing job of avoiding a multi-car accident (albeit screwing his ride in the process).
No, the SUV did not hang around. There was not contact with the SUV, as the S2000 driver avoided it very well (had contact ocurred, 3-4 more cars would have been involved....us being one of them). I would not call it a hit and run, but the illegal lane change DEFINITELY caused this accident. Had the driver been going 70 instead of 95, the exact same thing would have happened (the rear end tends to step out on our cars at speed with sudden directional changes....aka-oversteer).
If anyone knows who the driver was (I did not think to get his info), please have him contact me for a statement / affadavit of what occured.
Thanks
John
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Jan 16 2006, 08:55 AM
S2000's are incredibly safe. The US has no rollover crash testing, so honda did their own. They rolled the car at 55-65mph and designed the car to be safe in such cases. I have never heard of mercedes or volvo also performing such tests.
While it's difficult to say what may be safer, keep in mind the S2000 has the highest safety ratings in all US tested collisions.
Aside from that is the MANY people who have had TERRIBLE accidents and walked away barely scratched. S2000's have gone off small cliffs, dropped 20-40 feet, rolled or landed upside down, top down, and the passengers walked out unscathed. There was another S2000 that slammed into a piece of metal/machinery that fell off a truck, and going 75mph, flipped the car and rolled over and over, and the driver walked out unharmed. The outside of the car looked like a mangled wreck, while the inside looked untouched. Another S2000 lost control and got T-boned by a semi on the passenger side. The driver of the Semi thought for sure he had killed the passenger, but to his surprise, the passenger emerged with barely a bruise. There was a man who's son and his son's friend had gone out for a drive, lost control on a canyon road, went off the road into the trees and landed upside down, and they survived with, once again, barely a scratch.
And the list goes on. There are plenty of accidents in S2000's where it wasn't a "rollover" and there were much more direct impacts. This car is a lot safer than people give it credit for. Honda safety-engineered the CRAP out of this car. Between real world examples, and crash test results, I think it's an accurate statement to say that the S2000 is one of the safer/safest cars on the road today. Just because it's a soft top doesn't mean it's not safer than a mercedes or volvo. It's safer, because honda engineered it that way.
While it's difficult to say what may be safer, keep in mind the S2000 has the highest safety ratings in all US tested collisions.
Aside from that is the MANY people who have had TERRIBLE accidents and walked away barely scratched. S2000's have gone off small cliffs, dropped 20-40 feet, rolled or landed upside down, top down, and the passengers walked out unscathed. There was another S2000 that slammed into a piece of metal/machinery that fell off a truck, and going 75mph, flipped the car and rolled over and over, and the driver walked out unharmed. The outside of the car looked like a mangled wreck, while the inside looked untouched. Another S2000 lost control and got T-boned by a semi on the passenger side. The driver of the Semi thought for sure he had killed the passenger, but to his surprise, the passenger emerged with barely a bruise. There was a man who's son and his son's friend had gone out for a drive, lost control on a canyon road, went off the road into the trees and landed upside down, and they survived with, once again, barely a scratch.
And the list goes on. There are plenty of accidents in S2000's where it wasn't a "rollover" and there were much more direct impacts. This car is a lot safer than people give it credit for. Honda safety-engineered the CRAP out of this car. Between real world examples, and crash test results, I think it's an accurate statement to say that the S2000 is one of the safer/safest cars on the road today. Just because it's a soft top doesn't mean it's not safer than a mercedes or volvo. It's safer, because honda engineered it that way.
More often then not, the survival rate of the passanger is based on 2 variables -- the type of crash & the ability of the chassis to absorb & displace energy. No doubt that Honda did a lot of work with crash testing on the S2000.
But some of the claims that an S2k will survive a type of wreck while another vehicle would not, even tho they seem like the same type of accident, is based on what we say vs a scientific analysts.
For example, you quoted taht S2ks have fallen off cliffs at high speeds and their occupants survived. But just this past year, a Peugeot WRC car rolled over a cliff and killed its co-driver, Micheal "Beef" Park. Same type of accident, however...it's just one of those things.




