S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 vs Miata: driving at "the limit"

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #21  
Blacknot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,167
Likes: 5
From: 727 ,Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Hawkstrike,Feb 12 2008, 03:42 PM
I'm surprised so many here are talking down about the Miata. It's a fantastic car, and probably one of the main reasons we have the S2000 today.

The beauty of owning an S2000 is that it's two cars in one -- it can be a docile, fun-loving sun car, then turn into a snarling track beast.

But I predict you'll never approach it's limits on city streets (and if you do, shame on you). And within safe street driving, the S2000 and Miata are much closer together in performance. Miatas are quite tossable and fun to drive fast even if they lack the S2000's acceleration. Both cars are great on the track.

The NC has the best convertable top design on the market in a soft top, and probably the best retractable hard top design on the market as well if you prefer that convenience.

Both cars should be equally reliable. Total operating costs, especially insurance, should be lower for the Miata. IMO, the S2000 has better interior design, fit and finish, and interior materials ... but you do pay more for it.

In the end it comes down to ... (1) what fits you better, and (2) what's another 70hp worth to you? Don't let the S2000's reputation scare you -- that will never be an issue if you learn to respect the car and drive it responsibly.

<------------- Guess what I chose when faced with the same decision.
I've owned both and you really cant even compare the two. Yes the miata is a great car and is a blast to drive even though it's slow but the S2k blows it away. Sad to say most men look gay in miata's atleast that's what my wife tells me.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #22  
SoMe0nE2tAlK2's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,674
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

I finally got around to taking my car to the track a few days ago.
It wasn't unperdictable at all. After I got a feel for it, I was able to feel when the tires were letting loose and when the car was about to slide.
Once it did slide, it wasnt abrupt or anything, it was pretty easy to control.

On my first run out the back end actually kicked out on me but I managed to save it pretty easily.

but... I'm not sure how much of this is relevant to a stock 08.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #23  
rcman100's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

Oh...forgot to mention. I prefer the layout of the S2K shift pattern to the other 6-speeds out there. There is something unnerving about having R next to 1st gear. that drove me nuts when I tested the Miata and Boxster. Just didn't feel right. Clearly not a BMW owner. Honda got it correct.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #24  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

MX5 body roll during hard cornering vvv.



I do not find this to be excessive. On rougher racing surfaces, the MX5 suspension eats up bumps far better than the S2000, and the anti-sway bars are stiff enough to keep the car acceptably flat during hard cornering, in spite of the softer springs (and greater suspension travel). I've autocrossed both (and that ugly dude in the picture above is me), and it's a wash. The S2000 is more fun, but the MX5 is easier to take to the limit.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #25  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by SoMe0nE2tAlK2,Feb 12 2008, 07:19 PM
I finally got around to taking my car to the track a few days ago.
It wasn't unperdictable at all. After I got a feel for it, I was able to feel when the tires were letting loose and when the car was about to slide.
Once it did slide, it wasnt abrupt or anything, it was pretty easy to control.

On my first run out the back end actually kicked out on me but I managed to save it pretty easily.

but... I'm not sure how much of this is relevant to a stock 08.
Even the earliest AP1's (like mine) are totally predictable. It's the drivers that are unpredictable, and when enough lame drivers blame the car, the car gets a bad reputation. Basically, anyone who tells you the S2000 is unpredictable is really telling you that they are, at best, only an average driver, and that they blame their car for their mistakes. Your car is a heck of a lot harder to spin than my car, but they are both totally predictable. Even with 300 WHP, gears, and an aggressive 1.5 KAAZ LSD, my car is STILL 100% predictable. You know well before getting into a slide that it's coming, and it only happens when the driver makes a mistake. Do anyone think I could come out of a donut and hit the small driveway the way I do in the animated gif in my signature if the car was unpredictable? That kind of thing is only possible if the driver can predict what the car is going to do.

The S2000 is not well suited for "average drivers," unless they want to learn, or will be content to drive the car well below it's limits at all times. Those who find it unpredictable should get something else to drive, because not being able to predict what your car is going to do is downright dangerous.

And, a base MY08 car will be even more stable than your car.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #26  
GT_NFR's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Default

get a miata.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #27  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by rcman100,Feb 12 2008, 07:31 PM
Oh...forgot to mention. I prefer the layout of the S2K shift pattern to the other 6-speeds out there. There is something unnerving about having R next to 1st gear. that drove me nuts when I tested the Miata and Boxster. Just didn't feel right. Clearly not a BMW owner. Honda got it correct.
I like the new MX5 (I like all MX5's), but the S2000 shifter is SO much better than any stock MX5 shifter that there is just no comparison. If I lived in some place like Detroit, where the infrastructure was crumbling and the roads were horrible, I *might* consider one of the new MX5's, because they are remarkably supple, but there is really *nothing* about an MX5 that I like more than the S2000. I prefer the smaller size and lighter weight of the early MX5's, and with a supercharger they easily make as much or more WHP than a stock S2000, but I STILL like the S2000 much better. You will too, and the base MY08 car is not going to get you into any more trouble than a new MX5. LOL, you'll only get into trouble if you drive like an idiot, and if you're going to do that, it won't matter what you're driving.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #28  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by Choungsgay,Feb 12 2008, 07:53 PM
get a miata.
Didn't Mazda drop the "Miata" name on the new model? I thought it was just an "MX5" now.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #29  
SoMe0nE2tAlK2's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,674
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Wow you know your roadsters

Great input
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 04:09 PM
  #30  
ATOice's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 1
From: NJ/FL
Default

You'll be happy with both. But the S, will definitely satisfy you more. All the hp I push, not once have I worried. And I am on the bottom part of the totem pole for hp.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 AM.