S2k Insurance question
A little off topic but I want to share my thoughts. I used to despise auto insurance companies. I hated the fact that the state forced me to purchase a policy and if I didn't get in to an accident there went my $1200 dollars. Gone.
Last year I had an accident. I did $14,000 dollars damage to my car. I am glad the $900 I had paid last year covered the $14,000 in damages, that would have hurt if I had been denied due to misleading the insurance company just to save a few hundred bucks (which I have done in the past but no more
)
I think totally differently about insurance now. I am glad theres a company to take care of my car if something happens like my seats get stolen or some dick decides to vandalize my car.
Think about the 6 month or yearly cost for your policy. Is it a whole lot compared to what some of the parts on these cars cost? no.
Last year I had an accident. I did $14,000 dollars damage to my car. I am glad the $900 I had paid last year covered the $14,000 in damages, that would have hurt if I had been denied due to misleading the insurance company just to save a few hundred bucks (which I have done in the past but no more
)I think totally differently about insurance now. I am glad theres a company to take care of my car if something happens like my seats get stolen or some dick decides to vandalize my car.
Think about the 6 month or yearly cost for your policy. Is it a whole lot compared to what some of the parts on these cars cost? no.
I've had 2 car's stollen and because of good standing I was compensated with no questions asked.
In fact that's how I ended up with the S2000.....I purchased it with the settlement money from the theft.
Originally Posted by dml256,Apr 28 2005, 05:27 AM
So it all comes down to a question of ethics, and nobody on this board can help you with that.
You all have helped shed some light (actually, a LOT of light in the case of hirev... maybe too much light
) on an unfamiliar topic. Hopefully I'm not the only one who learned a little bit.
what if you reside in 2 places? use the cheaper zipcode to insure. is that fraud?
So if you reside in 2 places and it's split more or less evenly between the 2, you have every right to insure your car in the cheaper of the two. LEGALLY.
If it's split less than evenly... well, then you get to read this entire thread from start to finish again
Originally Posted by RyanS2000,Apr 28 2005, 08:08 AM
You can believe whatever you want, but you're wrong. For the first half of this decade the auto insurance maket has had a combined ratio of 106.3. This means that insurance companies have lost 6.3 cents on every dollar overall. You can find this information on websites such as www.iii.org if you had decided to research the information instead of just guessing at what you think it is.
Originally Posted by RyanS2000,Apr 26 2005, 08:44 PM
....and thanks to people like you I have to pay $3000 a year for two Hondas. thumbsdown.gif
I bet you are either young (<25), unmarried, dont own a house, or just a dumbass driver who can't stop getting tickets or into accidents.
Originally Posted by RyanS2000,Apr 27 2005, 09:23 AM
Remember, you do not have a right to have insurance.
Originally Posted by hellothere,Apr 29 2005, 09:58 AM
Then why is a resident of New Jersey REQUIRED to get insurance? If you can't choose NOT to have insurance, then how can you say that? You have to have insurance and the state forces insurance companies to provide insurance to everyone who asks.



