S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

s2k reliable?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 07:49 PM
  #1  
rpg51's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,296
Likes: 260
From: Vermont
Default s2k reliable?

We read a lot about folks who run into significant mechanical trouble with their s2ks - over rev valve problems, tight valve problems and the like on this forum. Let's hear from folks who have experienced essentially trouble free operation for long periods of time. I have to think there are many of you out there. I have had zero trouble with my s2k. Of course, I haven't over rev'd the engine either. And, mine is a low mileage car. What about you?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 07:56 PM
  #2  
SoFlaKidd's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 180
Likes: 16
Default

I got my LPB 08 with 116k on it in Dec of 15 and now it has 136k so 20k miles in the last year and only major issue i've had was a dead battery
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 07:59 PM
  #3  
Singh_snisen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 861
Likes: 24
From: United States
Default

Iv had an S2k with over 200k and tracked it every month. It was bulletproof. Just like a any other Honda, it's very reliable.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 08:07 PM
  #4  
Nerd-Vol's Avatar
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 432
Likes: 35
Default

Knock on wood, my 2004 has been in the family since new, no major issues. Oil changes, fluid changes, one or two batteries, tires, and brakes. It's got 62,500 on the clock, with about 7,000 of them mine. I wish I asked dad what services he did and did not have done, among so many other things.

Im going to try and get a valve adjustment this year.

I like to go to the dragon a few times a year, and it sees vtec on a regular basis. This car needs to be pushed to have real fun, and I'm not afraid to do so!

Last edited by Nerd-Vol; Mar 23, 2017 at 01:47 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 09:09 PM
  #5  
cosmomiller's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,904
Likes: 3,435
From: Foothills East of Sacramento
Default

Nothing mechanical. 62K miles. 2009.
That being said, I think preemptive maintenance has saved me from some real headaches. Rear axle TSB. Valves WERE tight and saved them from being torched 20K miles ago.
Changing out fluids, bleed brakes, clutch, etc saves you from problems later. Keep up on it, don't abuse the car and it should do very well.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 09:27 PM
  #6  
s2cho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 7
Default

Got mine with 60k miles and is now at 115k in about 6 years, never broke down on me and I dont think it will for a while lol. Have had some issues with some misfire here and there but thats expected we dont have a fuel filter (clogged injectors for me). People who have trouble are the ones who are clueless and dont take care of important maintenance then go beat the living hell out of the car and cry when something breaks.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 09:42 PM
  #7  
windhund116's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,358
Likes: 1,795
Default

Originally Posted by rpg51
We read a lot about folks who run into significant mechanical trouble with their s2ks - over rev valve problems, tight valve problems and the like on this forum. Let's hear from folks who have experienced essentially trouble free operation for long periods of time. I have to think there are many of you out there. I have had zero trouble with my s2k. Of course, I haven't over rev'd the engine either. And, mine is a low mileage car. What about you?
Well... any car --- even a mega-buck, super sports car --- is going to have issues, if you run past redline. Other than keeping an eye on valve clearance and getting a good timing chain tensioner --- no weird peccadilloes like other sports cars. Can't think of many cars of this genre regularly hitting 100-150K miles.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 23, 2017 | 02:30 AM
  #8  
Chuck S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13,827
Likes: 1,549
From: Chesterfield VA
Default

Driver stupidity will trump reliability in some cases.

Downshifting to slow the car rather than use the brakes was necessary before the advent of disc brakes. That era ended with the circa 1953 Jaguar C-type ... But it's still something sports car drivers think is necessary or sporty.

-- Chuck
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 05:46 AM
  #9  
Conedodger's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,471
Likes: 35
From: Upstate NY
Default

I'm the original owner of a 2003 AP1. Started autocrossing it heavily with 700 miles on the clock. 15-20 events a year. 6K rpm launches on Hoosier R-compounds for years. The car currently has 60K miles on it. Last year I replaced my first factory part...the 13 year old battery. I still have the original brake pads and rotors in the car. This is the most reliable car I have owned in my 40 years of driving.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 06:14 AM
  #10  
cosmomiller's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,904
Likes: 3,435
From: Foothills East of Sacramento
Default

Originally Posted by Conedodger
This is the most reliable car I have owned in my 40 years of driving.
Time will tell. My first car, a 64 Dodge Coronet 440, was sold with 265K miles on it. One starter and clutch. That was it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:27 AM.