s2k vs nsx
Only that one guy was being an idiot... Everyone else liked it and he only succeeded in looking like an ass on his own board.
I only wish a Ferrari owner went on that thread and posted something like: "An NSX, Bling... please... Hondas are so common. An NSX is just a MR Accord with Vtec!"
Then I'd like to see that guy keep talking about personal opinions...
I only wish a Ferrari owner went on that thread and posted something like: "An NSX, Bling... please... Hondas are so common. An NSX is just a MR Accord with Vtec!"
Then I'd like to see that guy keep talking about personal opinions...
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower,Sep 12 2005, 08:03 AM
Bah, civics have VTEC too
They should've at least said convertible RWD civic
They should've at least said convertible RWD civic

the rest have either SOHC vtec or VTEC-E, neither of which I consider true VTEC
If I paid the going price on a used vehicle that was overpriced to begin with, still is overpriced, and hasn't changed hardly at all in the last 15 years, I'd be wanting to bash something myself
the nsx can only be considered over priced because the S is so underpriced. never forget that the nsx is one of japan's national treasures and that the S is a freak of nature that we're lucky to benefit from.
Originally Posted by dyhppy,Sep 12 2005, 11:24 PM
the nsx can only be considered over priced because the S is so underpriced. never forget that the nsx is one of japan's national treasures and that the S is a freak of nature that we're lucky to benefit from.
Originally Posted by iamhomin,Sep 13 2005, 08:29 AM
Please explain why you think it's over priced. And tell me how you think the S2K is underpriced.


if you were to ask me..i will say NSX is overpriced. why? because of 89k msrp. now if it was like 60k then it would about right for performance and what you get.
now that is my opinion.



