Sequential
I'm not too familiar with manual tranny's and such, and am just getting down shifting (still workin on HT) but I was talking to a buddy at work, and he was telling me about sequential shifting and that my car was probably like that. (Back in his day they called it speed shifting) So I tried it, and it works for me. I was wondering if anyone does this or not, and how hard is it on the car. I've found that it works fine at 5k rpm's (not vtec
) but I'm afraid to try it any higher for fear of grinding. I tried searching but didn't come up with anything, so what are all of your thoughts on this? Thanks
Chris
) but I'm afraid to try it any higher for fear of grinding. I tried searching but didn't come up with anything, so what are all of your thoughts on this? ThanksChris
ST, your post is a little confusing.
Sequential shifting normally refers to a shift pattern where (like a motorcycle) gears can only be changed up/down one gear at a time and the change is accomplished by pushing backwards/forwards on the lever (push foward for up/push backward for down - no H pattern).
Speed shifting, however, is basically changing gears without taking your foot off the throttle (and is sometimes used on a bike to describe not using the clutch either). I think this is what you are referring to.
As for myself, I wouldn't like to try it - it makes gear selection that little bit harder and I already get enough grinds as it is.
Sequential shifting normally refers to a shift pattern where (like a motorcycle) gears can only be changed up/down one gear at a time and the change is accomplished by pushing backwards/forwards on the lever (push foward for up/push backward for down - no H pattern).
Speed shifting, however, is basically changing gears without taking your foot off the throttle (and is sometimes used on a bike to describe not using the clutch either). I think this is what you are referring to.
As for myself, I wouldn't like to try it - it makes gear selection that little bit harder and I already get enough grinds as it is.
sorry for the confusion, what i was referring to is shifting without using the clutch. I think it's kind of neat how it pops in without losing any rpm's, but i do let of the accelerator when I do it. hopefully this clears it up a bit and gets some more replies.
Clutchless shifting requires good rev matching. If the revs don't match *exactly*, the syncros in the transmission take over the role of the clutch, forcing either the car or the engine to adjust it's speed to make a match. Therefore I'd recommend against clutchless shifting, since clutches are easier to replace when worn than synchromeshes
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




