S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Sequential

Thread Tools
 
Old May 11, 2001 | 09:13 PM
  #1  
Supertool2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Wayne
Default

I'm not too familiar with manual tranny's and such, and am just getting down shifting (still workin on HT) but I was talking to a buddy at work, and he was telling me about sequential shifting and that my car was probably like that. (Back in his day they called it speed shifting) So I tried it, and it works for me. I was wondering if anyone does this or not, and how hard is it on the car. I've found that it works fine at 5k rpm's (not vtec ) but I'm afraid to try it any higher for fear of grinding. I tried searching but didn't come up with anything, so what are all of your thoughts on this? Thanks

Chris
Reply
Old May 11, 2001 | 09:46 PM
  #2  
2kturkey's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne!
Default

ST, your post is a little confusing.

Sequential shifting normally refers to a shift pattern where (like a motorcycle) gears can only be changed up/down one gear at a time and the change is accomplished by pushing backwards/forwards on the lever (push foward for up/push backward for down - no H pattern).

Speed shifting, however, is basically changing gears without taking your foot off the throttle (and is sometimes used on a bike to describe not using the clutch either). I think this is what you are referring to.

As for myself, I wouldn't like to try it - it makes gear selection that little bit harder and I already get enough grinds as it is.
Reply
Old May 11, 2001 | 09:57 PM
  #3  
Supertool2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Wayne
Default

sorry for the confusion, what i was referring to is shifting without using the clutch. I think it's kind of neat how it pops in without losing any rpm's, but i do let of the accelerator when I do it. hopefully this clears it up a bit and gets some more replies.
Reply
Old May 11, 2001 | 11:42 PM
  #4  
4IGS2000's Avatar
Spammer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Partwhoresville
Default

The shifting without a clutch is tiptronic, like the Prelude. All S2000s are manual 6speed, and shifting without using the clutch is stupid.
Reply
Old May 12, 2001 | 01:03 PM
  #5  
hoof's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

Clutchless shifting requires good rev matching. If the revs don't match *exactly*, the syncros in the transmission take over the role of the clutch, forcing either the car or the engine to adjust it's speed to make a match. Therefore I'd recommend against clutchless shifting, since clutches are easier to replace when worn than synchromeshes
Reply
Old May 12, 2001 | 04:31 PM
  #6  
Utah S2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,307
Likes: 13
From: Ogden
Default

I have a '93 Wrangler....my Stook is faster .
Reply
Old May 12, 2001 | 07:27 PM
  #7  
S2K_CLS's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Portland
Default

if you aren't too familiar with a manual tranny, this isn't going to improve your friendship... (in my opinion)


[QUOTE]Originally posted by Supertool2
[B]
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MIAMI S-2000
South Florida
5
Aug 29, 2007 12:24 PM
s2kwei
S2000 Talk
8
Nov 10, 2006 08:04 AM
WhiteS2k
Car and Bike Talk
29
Oct 11, 2004 07:24 PM
JSfetko
New York - Upstate New York S2000 Owners
21
Sep 12, 2004 09:14 AM
germ79
S2000 Talk
4
Aug 12, 2002 02:28 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 PM.