The title of the thread is a little misleading and that is about it. I thought the article decent. Back when Enzo started, rear engine cars weren't around in the Grand Prix sense, which is a little misleading...

Don't know why people are all over someone who contributed a good article to this forum.

 

it amazes me how s2k owners can speak so low of our car.

 

http://www.sfgate.com -- Bottom of the page.

Their words not mine. Crikey guys.

 

I have actually driven a Porsche.
My little Honda walked away from a Carrera 4.
The Porsche owner (see someone that actually owns one, not just fantasizes) was very nice and complimented the S and vice versa.

But you're obviously the expert.

 

i too have driven a couple modern porsches including the cayman s and while im sure they are faster on a track, it is not nearly as much fun. why would u pay so much more for less fun? status?

thanks to the OP for posting the story.

 

 

I think is was a very favorable S2000 article.

However, I didn't understand the part about those "2 cupholders" getting in the way of one's shifting arm. As far as I know, the "cupholder" is a divider in the center console and doesn't get in the way if there are no drinks being held.

Perhaps the author was driving around during the test with 2 giant slurpies.

 

Where did I say I was the expert?

BTW, Do I look like I give a crap that you "walked away" from a Carrera 4? Stock for stock the Porsche is faster so why should I believe you? If your car is modified then it is an unfair comparison. Do you have any video footage?

SHame on you

 

I own an S2000 because it is a great car. Nowhere did I ever say it wasnt. But I have the intelligence to know its not the greatest nor fastest car in the world like most owners on this forum are delusional enough to believe. Can you understand that?

 

true story