S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

skid pad

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #1  
jdo009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default skid pad

how many g's does a stock s2k pull on the skid pad

also whats your set up and what kind of g's are you pulling
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #2  
WVtwisties's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

looks like no one is paying attention to this topic!!!

I'm sure you can look that stock figure up but all I have to say is probably very very few S owners have had their car on a skid pad.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #3  
Fongu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Default

The skidpad number is mostly determined by the stickiness of the tires. Get really wide R-compounds or racing slicks and you'll be pulling big time G's. To a lesser extent, the front and rear balance of roll stiffness combined with camber settings and lower center of gravity effect skidpad numbers.

Anyways, it is only a single performance measurement (lateral grip at constant throttle) and in the whole scheme of things just as unimportant as something like a 0-60 time. Nice to know, but not the end all, be all, and definitely not a total measure of handling. It's better to have whatever setup that gives the particular driver confidence in the car, and that is different for everybody.

That being said, a stock S2000 exhibits mild-understeer on a skidpad. Theoretically you should try to increase front end grip, but most people complain about horrible oversteer (mainly bad control of throttle controlled oversteer) and changing the static balance to improve the skidpad would result in most people unanble to control a typical real-world high speed turn.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #4  
switchcars's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Default

I seem to remember seeing numbers for the AP1 and it pulled 0.81g on the skidpad.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #5  
Ludedude's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,835
Likes: 1
From: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by switchcars,Sep 11 2005, 08:08 PM
I seem to remember seeing numbers for the AP1 and it pulled 0.81g on the skidpad.
That would be 0.91 G for an AP1 chassis on OEM rubber.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #6  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

S2000 holds the highest (at least it did at one point) record for g's on a skidpad for modified factory production vehicle.

the Spoon S2000 did 1.17g's.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #7  
brent_strong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Franklin TN
Default

Another thing to remember is, like was mentioned before, the skidpad tells you very little about handling capability, just about maximum lateral grip. Polar moment of inertia and other such things aren't taken into account at all. IIRC, the best setup on a skidpad is a horribly simple chassis, a twin I-beam style. Obviously it doesn't follow that this is the best chassis for hanlding.

Just something to keep in mind.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #8  
mrmophandle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 18,375
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Default

Once I got used to the handling, I didn't need skidpads anymore. I still keep a set of Depends in the trunk just in case I find a good road though...
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #9  
WVtwisties's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

LIFE'S A SKIDPAD!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #10  
switchcars's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ludedude,Sep 11 2005, 08:00 PM
That would be 0.91 G for an AP1 chassis on OEM rubber.
oops....either my bad memory or a misprint from my source....I'm betting the first.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 AM.