S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Supercharged/Intercooled S2K

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 09:55 PM
  #1  
JiggaTaOG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

http://www.foxmarketing.net/id22.htm

Comptech Supercharger with a XS Intercooler

Anybody got more info on this car?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 10:16 PM
  #2  
socal28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles (SFV)
Default

Daaaaaaaamn! That's sweeeeeeet!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 03:40 AM
  #3  
S2K-F8's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 16
From: DENVER
Default

"293bhp at the wheels! 179 stock. "

Isn't 179hp at the rear wheels extremely low for our cars?
I thought most were atleast 190-200.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 04:21 AM
  #4  
BassMan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm
Default

Ooooo, i want to buy one! But i won't.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 05:30 AM
  #5  
Silver S2K's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: RTP
Default

I agree S2K-F8, 179 stock? His dif must be shot if he is loosing that much hp getting to the rear wheels.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 06:50 AM
  #6  
Pinky's Avatar
Community Organizer
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,644
Likes: 143
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

293 now hu? Well what is the car without the intercooler? Its about 293~ So that tells me NO GAIN!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 07:11 AM
  #7  
mingster's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Default

maybe somebody should write those people about the bad stock HP output...
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 04:44 PM
  #8  
SCS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

My car did 196hp stock and best run was 292.5hp with the supercharger and NO intercooler.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 05:18 PM
  #9  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Pinky
[B]293 now hu?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 06:06 PM
  #10  
2x6spds's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
From: newport beach
Default

An intercooled supercharged engine should definitely make more power than a supercharged engine without intercooler. The reason is simple - the cooler the air the greater the density per volume. That means more oxygen per cooler cubic whatever than per warmer cubic whatever.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 PM.