Tirewear VS Camber
#1
Tirewear VS Camber
I know adding more negative camber increases tirewear.
I have ran through a set of hankook rs2 (rear) in about 12k with stock camber
now i got a new set of rears with uk alignment and just curious too see how much its
actually affecting inner tirewear.
Has anyone tried to test how much it actually decreases treadlife? Obviously numbers will vary depending on tire and camber but i just wanted to get a rough estimation.
I have ran through a set of hankook rs2 (rear) in about 12k with stock camber
now i got a new set of rears with uk alignment and just curious too see how much its
actually affecting inner tirewear.
Has anyone tried to test how much it actually decreases treadlife? Obviously numbers will vary depending on tire and camber but i just wanted to get a rough estimation.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I run the Hankook RS2 on my AP1 16" wheels.
I run lots neg rear camber more than -2+ and my rears wear almost flat. The straight driving wears the inner edge, and all the twisties wear the outer edge. Apparently I have just about the perfect mix of both.
On the fronts I have about half the neg camber, the inner edge does indeed wear faster. Last year I removed everybit of toe and now it is a little better, not a lot, but livable for me for sure, considering the price of the tires.
I run lots neg rear camber more than -2+ and my rears wear almost flat. The straight driving wears the inner edge, and all the twisties wear the outer edge. Apparently I have just about the perfect mix of both.
On the fronts I have about half the neg camber, the inner edge does indeed wear faster. Last year I removed everybit of toe and now it is a little better, not a lot, but livable for me for sure, considering the price of the tires.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been running the UK alignment for over 10k miles now and I'm wearing evenly across. To be honest, I'd say toe is what will chew up your tires more than anything.
#5
Registered User
stock rear camber setting is -2.5 i think.
but any R compound tire will wear out faster.
That's why i have the ze-912. sucker refuse to wear out! grips good in rain and dry traction. really happy with it.
but any R compound tire will wear out faster.
That's why i have the ze-912. sucker refuse to wear out! grips good in rain and dry traction. really happy with it.
#6
Originally Posted by plokivos,Feb 6 2008, 01:16 PM
stock rear camber setting is -2.5 i think.
but any R compound tire will wear out faster.
That's why i have the ze-912. sucker refuse to wear out! grips good in rain and dry traction. really happy with it.
but any R compound tire will wear out faster.
That's why i have the ze-912. sucker refuse to wear out! grips good in rain and dry traction. really happy with it.
If you want to maximaze the tire life, get them remounted about half way through the life of the tire (not rotated ofcourse).
-Hockey
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by plokivos,Feb 6 2008, 01:16 PM
stock rear camber setting is -2.5 i think.
but any R compound tire will wear out faster.
That's why i have the ze-912. sucker refuse to wear out! grips good in rain and dry traction. really happy with it.
but any R compound tire will wear out faster.
That's why i have the ze-912. sucker refuse to wear out! grips good in rain and dry traction. really happy with it.
#9
Originally Posted by Project22a,Feb 6 2008, 01:54 PM
stock rear camber is -1.5