S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Topgear s2000 cr

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 06:20 AM
  #11  
S2Kage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,939
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

"ricer math" hahah
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 08:53 AM
  #12  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

The S2K and the NSX-R both got pretty shxtty conditions around the track

Also, those runs were done when they first switched over to the white STIG. If you notice, the STIG has been driving more aggressively as time progressed.

Nevertheless, the CR won't score too well on that track, as it's very much a Power Lap ... the S2000 has too little power to make anything impressive on it
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #13  
Christople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
From: Corn Country
Default

They will do a final test on that car since it's its last year like a "send off" like they did for the NSX
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:29 AM
  #14  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

it said "very Wet" next to the S200CR, if thats what I think it means how can you even compare a wet track time vs dry track time?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 10:19 AM
  #15  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyBalls,Feb 21 2009, 01:29 PM
it said "very Wet" next to the S200CR, if thats what I think it means how can you even compare a wet track time vs dry track time?
they claim that wet track adds another 4 seconds or so

but of course ... each car responses differently to wet conditions

Also the amount of water on the track also matters
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:06 PM
  #16  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by foxy_s2k,Feb 13 2009, 06:52 AM
lol, never mind, me too (IT consultant). lol.

Would love to meet a Nighthawk pilot though. Must be cool as hell.

Back to topic with apologies...
why fly a F-117 when you can fly this bad boy

Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:12 PM
  #17  
ECale3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,809
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

Cause that plane isn't stealth...and can't blow shit up.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #18  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

true, but it does carry Flight Attendants
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #19  
ECale3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,809
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

^ That only somewhat makes up for it...and only if the flight attendant is a chick and not a gay dude.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #20  
craig2teg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio TX
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyBalls,Feb 21 2009, 04:16 PM
true, but it does carry Flight Attendants
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM.