S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

what makes the 2.2 a 2.2

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 05:14 AM
  #11  
kfar09's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Default

hahaha
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:06 AM
  #12  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

I dropped my redline to 4k rpms and now I have a 5 litre. SWEEEEET
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:06 AM
  #13  
00CivicSi's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,583
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by overst33r,Jul 19 2007, 08:29 AM
No. Lowering the redline will not cause displacement to magically go up. They lowered the redline because the engine makes maximum torque earlier, therefore making maximum hp sooner. There is no replacement for displacement.

EDIT: whoops, didn't see the LOL at the bottom... so your comment was sarcastic i guess...
True that the peak HP and TQ occur at lower engine speeds, but the redline was lowered because the increased stroke causes higher piston speeds for the same engine speed. It seems Honda felt that piston speed was a limiting factor.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:20 AM
  #14  
overst33r's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 00CivicSi,Jul 19 2007, 06:06 AM
True that the peak HP and TQ occur at lower engine speeds, but the redline was lowered because the increased stroke causes higher piston speeds for the same engine speed. It seems Honda felt that piston speed was a limiting factor.
I've read about that issue as well. With the F22's current characteristics, a higher redline will result in a significant power loss after 8000 RPM.

I'm sure Honda could have given the F22c a 9k redline, but then it would not have had the same torque increase as it does with the 8k redline.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:25 AM
  #15  
8kGoodENuff's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,452
Likes: 6
From: Northeast Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by overst33r,Jul 19 2007, 06:20 AM
I've read about that issue as well. With the F22's current characteristics, a higher redline will result in a significant power loss after 8000 RPM.

I'm sure Honda could have given the F22c a 9k redline, but then it would not have had the same torque increase as it does with the 8k redline.
Actually... it has nothing to do with HP and Torque, it has to do with stress on the components. If the 2.2 kept the same redline of 9k, then the components would a shorter life span due to more stress.

Raising the redline from 8k to 9k would actually increase HP, as some have done by changing their ECU to the AP1 ECU.

Andre
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:52 AM
  #16  
00CivicSi's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,583
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by overst33r,Jul 19 2007, 10:20 AM
I've read about that issue as well. With the F22's current characteristics, a higher redline will result in a significant power loss after 8000 RPM.

I'm sure Honda could have given the F22c a 9k redline, but then it would not have had the same torque increase as it does with the 8k redline.
You mean just like the AP1 Dyno curves show? I'm not surprised.



8kGoodENuff @ Jul 19 2007, 10:25 AM]
Originally Posted by overst33r @ Jul 19 2007, 06:20 AM
I've read about that issue as well. With the F22's current characteristics, a higher redline will result in a significant power loss after 8000 RPM.

I'm sure Honda could have given the F22c a 9k redline, but then it would not have had the same torque increase as it does with the 8k redline.
Actually... it has nothing to do with HP and Torque, it has to do with stress on the components. If the 2.2 kept the same redline of 9k, then the components would a shorter life span due to more stress.

Raising the redline from 8k to 9k would actually increase HP, as some have done by changing their ECU to the AP1 ECU.
And max piston speed at redline is just one indication of the higher stresses the internal components would be subjected to.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 06:59 AM
  #17  
plokivos's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 2
From: atlanta
Default

so honda put a stoker kit on the 2.0 and made the maps little different.

should of just stuck the RDX turbo in the s2000, it would of sell better.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 07:06 AM
  #18  
__redruM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: WV Pan Handle
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Jul 19 2007, 01:40 AM
LOL, only if r is equal to 1/2 the bore and h is equal to the stroke.
If we're going to get detailed, is the displacement the volume of the accumulated strokes. Or is it this volume plus the compression area? That is the remaining Cylinder volume at TDC (Top Dead Center).
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 07:11 AM
  #19  
MpBradyS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Default

Volume plus area? Is that possible?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 07:47 AM
  #20  
N2oExpresS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=__redruM,Jul 19 2007, 07:06 AM] If we're going to get detailed, is the displacement the volume of the accumulated strokes.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 AM.