S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Whats the big deal?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 10:48 AM
  #11  
berlinablackie's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 24
Default

The only change I would have liked on a CR is making the hardtop permanent, non removable...a true coupe. A true [club] race car. My $.02

Great car, envious of those that own them.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #12  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

When my wife and I went to the Chicago auto show in 2007, I saw a blue CR and thought it was the most heinous thing ever.

Didn't see another one in person until a local autocross when a black one showed up.

Bought one the next weekend for $27,500 new and the Obama tax credit made the actual OTD price very nice.

The "ugly but functional" look grows on you. Like Evos and STIs did in the early 2000s. I thought Evos were hideous at first, but now I like them too.

The things I like about the CR (besides the looks, which have grown on me):
1. Same steering ratio as the AP1. Quicker rack than other AP2s.
2. Stiffer springs mean the car can wear wider tires than "other AP2s" without getting into the fender liners, especially in front where the CRs are pretty much the only model that can squeeze 275s up front without destroying the liners in short order.

If you autocross, you'll know that sometimes people are 0.01 seconds apart. And people spend money for every last bit of competitive edge. I never plan to "make money" off my CR, but pretty confident that it will hold its value compared to other AP2s, especially when you consider that many of us paid up to $10k off MSRP for our new ones.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #13  
bloodzombie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Default

I think the CR looks great in person, especially in black, and I really like the seats.

Having no soft top is a deal breaker for me.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #14  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

No soft top ruined it for me - we should have gotten the Type S like elsewhere.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #15  
CorneringMachine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Default

the car looks good IMO, but I I can't live without the automatic soft top nor the A/C
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #16  
patinum's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,572
Likes: 18
From: Second City
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Aug 13 2010, 01:18 PM
No soft top ruined it for me - we should have gotten the Type S like elsewhere.
I agree. I always thought it would be better for them to come out with the Type-S and invent and release a Type-S Zero (essentially a CR without a/c and radio and maybe some lighter wheels and seats or something).
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #17  
patinum's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,572
Likes: 18
From: Second City
Default

Originally Posted by CorneringMachine,Aug 13 2010, 01:26 PM
the car looks good IMO, but I I can't live without the automatic soft top nor the A/C
A/C was optional. Only 59 of us have one without it.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #18  
si2ik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

at first i thought the CR was ugly but now, i think its look hot except for the big wing.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #19  
berlinablackie's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by patinum,Aug 13 2010, 02:28 PM
A/C was optional. Only 59 of us have one without it.
Purist!

Are you without radio too?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 01:09 PM
  #20  
shockwave667's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale
Default

Originally Posted by patinum,Aug 13 2010, 11:26 AM
I agree. I always thought it would be better for them to come out with the Type-S and invent and release a Type-S Zero (essentially a CR without a/c and radio and maybe some lighter wheels and seats or something).
Honestly if it was my daily driver I would agree, but it seem for many of us CR owners the car is just a weekend toy.

Yes a softop is very nice to have and I never use my hard top, BUT I love the rear cowl. Would never give that up for a soft top
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:14 AM.