what's a normal dynopack # for the S with I/H/E?
#2
The Church Dynapack dynoed several year '00 stock and they averaged 213 rwhp. Intake, headers and exhaust might add a few ponies to that number but usually not above 220 range from what I recall.
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are we talking about dynopack 5000, not dynojet? just making sure we are talking about : http://www.dynapack.com/dynapack.html
this dyno has 350z with I/H/E dynoed at 220.
wouldn't a 4.44 FD mess up dyno reading? if I am not mistaken hp # is measured as some factor X torque X RPM, and most dynos are just measuring how much force needed to stop the wheel from spinning (aka, torque).
this dyno has 350z with I/H/E dynoed at 220.
wouldn't a 4.44 FD mess up dyno reading? if I am not mistaken hp # is measured as some factor X torque X RPM, and most dynos are just measuring how much force needed to stop the wheel from spinning (aka, torque).
#5
Originally Posted by revto9k,Jun 29 2006, 02:39 PM
are we talking about dynopack 5000, not dynojet? just making sure we are talking about : http://www.dynapack.com/dynapack.html
this dyno has 350z with I/H/E dynoed at 220.
wouldn't a 4.44 FD mess up dyno reading? if I am not mistaken hp # is measured as some factor X torque X RPM, and most dynos are just measuring how much force needed to stop the wheel from spinning (aka, torque).
this dyno has 350z with I/H/E dynoed at 220.
wouldn't a 4.44 FD mess up dyno reading? if I am not mistaken hp # is measured as some factor X torque X RPM, and most dynos are just measuring how much force needed to stop the wheel from spinning (aka, torque).
A stock AP-1 with 4.10 rear end gears would have 5.521 as a ratio using 4th gear.
If 3rd gear is used then a ratio of 7.044 should be used, if 5th gear is used then a ratio of 4.618 should be used.
Ratios can be obtained from http://www.turnzero.com/technical_resource...gear_calculator
TCF should be zero.
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey sideways, so on a dynapack a 350z with i/h/e should make more than 220?
I am trying to figure out my dyno result, my # is low compared to what an S should make on dynapacks, yet my compression is 210s across, leak down tests came clean. I was told a stock s2k should make about 170-180 on dynapack.
I am trying to figure out my dyno result, my # is low compared to what an S should make on dynapacks, yet my compression is 210s across, leak down tests came clean. I was told a stock s2k should make about 170-180 on dynapack.
#7
Originally Posted by revto9k,Jun 29 2006, 06:31 PM
hey sideways, so on a dynapack a 350z with i/h/e should make more than 220?
I am trying to figure out my dyno result, my # is low compared to what an S should make on dynapacks, yet my compression is 210s across, leak down tests came clean. I was told a stock s2k should make about 170-180 on dynapack.
I am trying to figure out my dyno result, my # is low compared to what an S should make on dynapacks, yet my compression is 210s across, leak down tests came clean. I was told a stock s2k should make about 170-180 on dynapack.
As for a 350z check out these threads:
http://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=192512
http://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=177503&page=5
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks sideways
umm, this dyno reads 350z's # low too. by ratio wise 200s on the dyno I've been using should be sth like 230s on other dyno...
it's not a mustang dyno for sure. is there anyway the dyno could be configured wrong? or does dyno loose accruacy over years? speed seems to match.
wait I just remember sth, this particular dyno was mostly used for 4wd cars, I am no expert on dynos, doesn't 4wd needs different configuration?
umm, this dyno reads 350z's # low too. by ratio wise 200s on the dyno I've been using should be sth like 230s on other dyno...
it's not a mustang dyno for sure. is there anyway the dyno could be configured wrong? or does dyno loose accruacy over years? speed seems to match.
wait I just remember sth, this particular dyno was mostly used for 4wd cars, I am no expert on dynos, doesn't 4wd needs different configuration?