S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.
View Poll Results: What's YOUR V-tec engagement point?
5500 RPM
5.06%
6000 RPM
74.68%
6500 RPM
18.99%
7000 RPM
1.27%
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

What's YOUR V-tec engagement point?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 09:05 AM
  #21  
wileecoyote's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Default

From all the dyno chart that ever posted on this board,
I can see a big transition of torque near the vtech changeover rpm
(5850) that I had stated before.
The dyno charts don't lie and different cars dyno test at different temp,
air pressure and oil temp but they all shows the same characteristic.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 09:22 AM
  #22  
Flite's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: middle of a corn field
Default

I engage at 5600 rpms. And heres one for ya. If you guys with a V-AFC have it tuned properly, you won't feel VTEC switch at all. Also, What happened to 6100 rpms? I thought 6100 was stock. In part throttle applications mine kicks at 6100 rpms. Thats not by the stock tach either, thats from the V-AFC.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 09:50 AM
  #23  
AnDy_PaNdY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 10,655
Likes: 0
From: stafford
Default

6k
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 09:51 AM
  #24  
Ldogdotcom's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton
Default

For the 5850 numer dyno graph people... did you ever think that 5850 is the number where HP and torque cross? After all, HP is a mathmatically derived function of torque, with 5850 being the "magic number." It's not actually HP that you are measuring, it's torque, and the HP is derived from there.

But for the record, when I had my S, VTEC engaged at 6500.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 10:32 AM
  #25  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ldogdotcom
[B]For the 5850 number dyno graph people... did you ever think that 5850 is the number where HP and torque cross? After all, HP is a mathematically derived function of torque, with 5850 being the "magic number." It's not actually HP that you are measuring, it's torque, and the HP is derived from there.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 10:37 AM
  #26  
Cyber Logic's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ldogdotcom
[B]For the 5850 numer dyno graph people... did you ever think that 5850 is the number where HP and torque cross? After all, HP is a mathmatically derived function of torque, with 5850 being the "magic number." It's not actually HP that you are measuring, it's torque, and the HP is derived from there.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 02:37 PM
  #27  
Tugz_S2K's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,402
Likes: 1
From: DOG POO ON Ur LAWN
Default

OK, so the usuall VTEC engagement point it 5850rpms. That is when the VTEC switches from Mid to Secondary (WILD) cam. I know the S2K has 3 cam lobes for each pair of valves. Primary, Mid, and secondary. When does VTEC switch from Primary to Mid? Anyone know??
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #28  
SteveUCI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 0
From: Glendale/Burbank/LA
Default

Great link Cyber Logic, just when I thought there was nothing else to know about the S2K, there's a little bit more to it.... However, I'd like to point out that parts of that link you gave us contradict what you said:

[QUOTE]
LOW-AND MEDIUM-SPEED OPERATION
In the S2000 VTEC engine, each intake and exhaust valve uses two different cam-lobe profiles: one for low engine speeds and a second for high engine speeds. From idle to around 6000 rpm, the two intake and exhaust valve cam followers at each cylinder are actuated by low-rpm cam lobes. Their short duration and low lift ensures good cylinder-filling at low engine speeds.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 04:34 AM
  #29  
Blk01S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Palm Springs
Default

I guess all of us that have the 6k engagement would be noticably faster than the 6.5k engagement..
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2002 | 07:30 AM
  #30  
Suzuka2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by SteveUCI
[B]

I'm not "guessing" with any room for error when I say that I noticed VTEC was delayed til a sky-high 6600 when I was between 8-9000 feet in AZ.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 PM.