the front is fine
the a$$ is ugly
you got no idea what handling you got in the oem setup

style... honda inc. has their limits, 4example look at the new civic.

 

just to ammend the statement again, all the other roadsters like the tt, 350z, slk, boxster, z4 are not good looking either imo. the S IS a cool looking car, but for the millionth time, i'm comparing it to the best. althought the slk55 looks pretty good. it's amazing how different it looks compared to the base slk.

 

No matter how hard I try, I can't see "ugly."

The best looking roadsters have "clean" lines, and it doesn't get much cleaner than the S2000.

 

OK, did you just say the Z4 comes in your dreams, with a facial?

Hmm...

 

I don't know what car you've been looking at but the S2000 is HOT!

 

I think it has the same kind of good looks as an E46 M3:

Clean, classy, not huge body kit or rear airlplane wing, simple yet aggressive.

Only thing I would like changed for purely looks is:

1-Lower profile tires (I have an AP1)

2-Slight drop to fill the pretty big hole left by the tires, especially in the rear

 

The S2000 style and appearance is impressive, provided the car is clean, bone stock and many modified cars, the car looks fantastic!
The S's shark face, baby-ass smooth hood, wedge shape sleek-smooth side profile, smooth trunk deck, cockpit interior, etc.
The S's roadster style is timeless. At Watkins Glen in September, I saw a 1971 Lotus

 

I'm not a huge fan of the s2k's look with the convertible top up, but it definitely isn't "ugly."

 

The only ugly thing about this car its me

 

I think it is that ugly no one should ever by another




BTW I'm on my fourth