S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Why doesnt HONDA up the hp on S2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #21  
qbmurderer13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

soon theyll come out with a 280 hp s2000, itll be out for a couple years, then you guys will all be wondering why doesnt honda add more hp... its kind of like inflation.... but with hp.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 10:17 PM
  #22  
animeS2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 18
From: In the ether.
Default

I can easily add safe, conservative power with a supercharger for much less than it'd cost me to to sell my car and get into a new one, so from an owner's perspective, I don't see caring all that much.

If they did boost it from 240 to 300 at the crank, that still wouldn't match the WHP of a S/C setup. Expect the price to jump with a boost in HP... Probably better bang for the buck with a s/c setup.

But I can kind of see the OP's point... We've had serious HP inflation in the import market since the S2000 was introduced. Look at the STi, Evo, Z, G-series, etc. That's not even counting the general uptrend in "sporty" class car HP.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:19 AM
  #23  
energetic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 30,032
Likes: 2
From: Athens, Greece, Europe, Earth, Universe
Default

I don't think the S2000 needs more power, and if its going to get more power it will be dangerous IMO. It will need a total upgrade to all the vehicle around to increase the hp within safe overall condition.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:03 AM
  #24  
trinis2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Caribbean - Trinidad
Default

Originally Posted by carrera4,Oct 25 2007, 12:44 AM
iVTEC is a proven way to add power. 100% certain you would see 10 lbs of torque across much of 3k to 6k RPM (where the peaks exist now you would see a little less) and few lbs above 6k. It's not rocket science... very simple technology.
And yet, isn't the F20C still more powerful than all versions of the K20 (except CTRR), in HP at least? I think the best tq on a k20 is the new CTR FD2 at 161 ft-lbs but 225hp. Just asking, cause 2L for 2L, the F20C still seems like the best thing ever created (NA).
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:12 AM
  #25  
PalenkosBro's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 959
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by MitsukillinS2K,Oct 24 2007, 04:08 PM
and with that you earn a direct flight to hell
hahahahahhaa
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:28 AM
  #26  
daktruckie99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,742
Likes: 4
From: Berkshires, MA
Default

Originally Posted by bobushka king,Oct 24 2007, 07:56 PM
.... Gretzky rebounds, scores!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:43 AM
  #27  
nastinupe1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA (ATL)
Default

Originally Posted by energetic,Oct 25 2007, 04:19 AM
I don't think the S2000 needs more power, and if its going to get more power it will be dangerous IMO. It will need a total upgrade to all the vehicle around to increase the hp within safe overall condition.
How can you say that with all these people doing power mods to their car? It's not like there's in increase in accidents when people add turbo's and SC's to their car.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 06:27 AM
  #28  
smurf2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
From: IN THE HOOD
Default

Originally Posted by nastinupe1,Oct 24 2007, 07:58 PM
You guys act like you've never heard of turbo before.
so why dont they slap a turbocharger on all of their cars, and increase all of their hp power, and have a leg-up on the competition.

its very easy to draw something on paper. its another to implement it. research? development? cost? time? will it upset the chassis? will it up-end another honda vehicle? reliability issues? will there be lag? reconfigure gearing? beefen transmission?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 06:30 AM
  #29  
LostMotion's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,217
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by trinis2001,Oct 25 2007, 06:03 AM
And yet, isn't the F20C still more powerful than all versions of the K20 (except CTRR), in HP at least? I think the best tq on a k20 is the new CTR FD2 at 161 ft-lbs but 225hp. Just asking, cause 2L for 2L, the F20C still seems like the best thing ever created (NA).
Again, it's a very simple technology allowing you to add more or less valve overlap based on where you are in the power curve. It would add power. Look at the shape of the TQ curve on a K20 versus an F20.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 06:50 AM
  #30  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by nastinupe1,Oct 25 2007, 09:43 AM
How can you say that with all these people doing power mods to their car? It's not like there's in increase in accidents when people add turbo's and SC's to their car.
Obviously there's still people out there who feel the S2000 is powerful enough - that's why Honda still sells over ten thousand a year. Its a great car, but a little engine development would be nice.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:59 PM.