S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Yet another new S2000 rumor!

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-19-2016, 11:40 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
NH_s2k_Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hooksett, New Hampshire
Posts: 13,506
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default Yet another new S2000 rumor!

Rumor: Honda to Celebrate Its 70th Anniversary with New S2000 Roadster
Old 05-19-2016, 01:35 PM
  #2  

 
jeffbrig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 2,531
Received 94 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Why in the world would a new s2000 get a detuned Civic Type-R motor? Should be the other way around... seriously, I just don't get the logic. Why would you slot a purpose-built roadster below the 'roided up version of a fwd economy car in your model lineup?
Old 05-19-2016, 01:55 PM
  #3  


 
Kenny_Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,795
Received 56 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jeffbrig
Why in the world would a new s2000 get a detuned Civic Type-R motor? Should be the other way around... seriously, I just don't get the logic. Why would you slot a purpose-built roadster below the 'roided up version of a fwd economy car in your model lineup?
Yeah, that's the only part of the rumor I don't like. I would hope that the new S2000 would get its own unique engine, which would be second only to the NSX.
Old 05-19-2016, 03:36 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
kyleBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Calling a Civic Type-R an economy car is funny lol…

Why do you guys need so much power and torque anyways? The fun about this car was always the fine balance between power, handling and weight distribution. Americans have this funny thought that more power is the solution for everything and sure isn't. This car isn't a GM of Ford V8 and should remain that way.

In my honest opinion even a turbocharged engine isn't necessary to bring the car back to it's glory unless for fuel economy purposes. This car would do just fine with a 300hp engine turbo or aspirated but I would never put my money on it if it had 350hp+
Old 05-19-2016, 05:04 PM
  #5  

 
Car Analogy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 0
Received 1,316 Likes on 994 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kyleBR
Calling a Civic Type-R an economy car is funny lol…

Why do you guys need so much power and torque anyways? The fun about this car was always the fine balance between power, handling and weight distribution. Americans have this funny thought that more power is the solution for everything and sure isn't. This car isn't a GM of Ford V8 and should remain that way.

In my honest opinion even a turbocharged engine isn't necessary to bring the car back to it's glory unless for fuel economy purposes. This car would do just fine with a 300hp engine turbo or aspirated but I would never put my money on it if it had 350hp+
Its shell is still an economy Civic. Its the classic formula of taking a 'regular' car, stuffing in a very powerful motor, and these days thankfully giving it matching suspension and brake upgrades. But NOT using that formula is precisely why our cars feel so special to drive. Purpose built chassis, motor, gearbox, etc. Its not a hotrod version of anything 'regular'.

Lets hope the new S, if it materializes, is also this special...

Sent from my SM-G920P using IB AutoGroup
Old 05-20-2016, 09:04 AM
  #6  

 
RTZX9R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WPB FL
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kyleBR
Why do you guys need so much power and torque anyways? The fun about this car was always the fine balance between power, handling and weight distribution. Americans have this funny thought that more power is the solution for everything and sure isn't. This car isn't a GM of Ford V8 and should remain that way.

In my honest opinion even a turbocharged engine isn't necessary to bring the car back to it's glory unless for fuel economy purposes. This car would do just fine with a 300hp engine turbo or aspirated but I would never put my money on it if it had 350hp+
Sounds like you need a base Civic, not an S2000. America is all about POWER, FREEDOM, and FREEDOM to have POWER.

If you don't enjoy power move to socialist Europe and you can have your 0.7L slow cars
Old 05-20-2016, 12:05 PM
  #7  
Registered User

 
Magnificent_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RTZX9R
Originally Posted by kyleBR' timestamp='1463701009' post='23971633
Why do you guys need so much power and torque anyways? The fun about this car was always the fine balance between power, handling and weight distribution. Americans have this funny thought that more power is the solution for everything and sure isn't. This car isn't a GM of Ford V8 and should remain that way.

In my honest opinion even a turbocharged engine isn't necessary to bring the car back to it's glory unless for fuel economy purposes. This car would do just fine with a 300hp engine turbo or aspirated but I would never put my money on it if it had 350hp+
Sounds like you need a base Civic, not an S2000. America is all about POWER, FREEDOM, and FREEDOM to have POWER.

If you don't enjoy power move to socialist Europe and you can have your 0.7L slow cars
What do you think we drive over here? Never seen a 0.7l around here
I do agree, we don't have mane 5.0l or more though.
Old 05-30-2016, 08:48 AM
  #8  

 
kaissi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Coto De Caza
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as long as it stays "manual transmission"
2.0 250HP light weight chassis , or 300-320 V6 NA, it doesnt matter
as long as the same character / MT remains.
Old 05-31-2016, 02:13 AM
  #9  
Registered User

 
Dman8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kyleBR
Calling a Civic Type-R an economy car is funny lol…

Why do you guys need so much power and torque anyways? The fun about this car was always the fine balance between power, handling and weight distribution. Americans have this funny thought that more power is the solution for everything and sure isn't. This car isn't a GM of Ford V8 and should remain that way.

In my honest opinion even a turbocharged engine isn't necessary to bring the car back to it's glory unless for fuel economy purposes. This car would do just fine with a 300hp engine turbo or aspirated but I would never put my money on it if it had 350hp+
how is it not a beefed up economy car? It is still FWD and still uses the same shell and many other parts from the most popular econo car ever made. Its obviously a very impressive performing car, but this isnt the same scenario as say an Evolution compared to Lancer
Old 06-01-2016, 03:31 AM
  #10  

 
Car Analogy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 0
Received 1,316 Likes on 994 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dman8
...., but this isnt the same scenario as say an Evolution compared to Lancer
...which itself could also be considered a beefed up economy car. While the drivetrain layout differs, its still the same shell, same suspension pickup points, same wheelbase. There are inherent compromises that wouldnt exist if it were a clean sheet performance design. Of course, then it would cost a lot more...

Sent from my SM-G920P using IB AutoGroup


Quick Reply: Yet another new S2000 rumor!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:02 PM.