S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

4.77 installed. Thumbs up!

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 05:13 AM
  #21  
TurboVtk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
From: Bronxville/NY
Default

i get about 280-290 it depends sometimes i get 300 when driving like grandma, when i vtec daily i get 250. but that is till way low near the end.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 05:35 AM
  #22  
ace9250's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: North Atlanta
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by slick rick
[B]



I don't understand you guys.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 07:25 AM
  #23  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally posted by Squeezer


use 6th gear anytime you are over 36 mph.
Pretty low for 6th gear stock. Hate to lug the engine.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 08:59 AM
  #24  
jguerdat's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prolene
[B] Pretty low for 6th gear stock.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 09:09 AM
  #25  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

I seriously doubt the F20C is as efficient at 2500 RPMs as it is at 3500 RPMs. Lugging an engine is not a good way to improve mileage.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 02:04 PM
  #26  
jguerdat's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY
Default

"It all depends." I'm talking about just driving around. Higher RPMs means higher pumping losses and frictional losses. Best fuel economy is generally around 35-40 mph in high gear. We ain't talking breathing at its sweet spot but whether there is harm or at least lack of fuel efficiency, not ultimate performance. Also, I'm not suggesting <1500 RPM in any gear due to NVH. It just isn't that big a thing...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 02:22 PM
  #27  
twohoos's Avatar
Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 365
From: Redondo Beach
Default

I'm with you, Slick, I never get 200 miles on a tank unless it's at least 1/3 freeway miles. I've gotten about 300 on all-freeway stints, though, and that's at 75-85mph.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #28  
jzr's Avatar
jzr
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cdelena
[B]I am really interested in track impressions. With shorter gears you should be able to pull out of turns at a lower rpm, but there is more shifting. Does it force shifts in awkward spots and is it harder to be smooth with the number of shifts required?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 03:33 PM
  #29  
TurboVtk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
From: Bronxville/NY
Default

very true whatever you gain from 4.77 have to be subtracted whatever you loose for having to shift, it will of course depend on the track since they all have diff turns that are taken at diff speed.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #30  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cdelena
[B]I am really interested in track impressions. With shorter gears you should be able to pull out of turns at a lower rpm, but there is more shifting. Does it force shifts in awkward spots and is it harder to be smooth with the number of shifts required?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:08 PM.