S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

5/24/03 Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Old May 27, 2003 | 04:51 PM
  #1  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default



Both times: Test pipe (pretty sure), Mugen ECU, 100 octane gas, Spoon snorkel, JR Filter, Toda flywheel, ACT Stage II clutch, Spoon exhaust, exclude AC from belt, water pump lightweight pulley. IK24 Denso Iridium plugs, gap valves tight, Mobil 1 oil. Hondata intake manifold gasket, insulation in and around stock intake box, ProFlow bored throttle body.

For latest dyno, replaced Mugen with Toda header, added emc's lightweight pulleys. Switched to Neo Synthetic transmission fluid, from 10w-30 Mobil 1 to 5w-30 Mobil 1, added AVBlend to crankcase oil for the heck of it.

Might help explain how my son made it to 115 mph indicated down the stretch at Spring Mountain.

Looks a bit like Toda's dyno plot regarding their header?
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #2  
S2000_Europe's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 1
From: MIAMI
Default

those 240 hp and 161 lb of torque are to the wheel? if yes it is a very impresive numbers for a F20C NA engine without touching the engine


Juan
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 05:09 PM
  #3  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally posted by S2000_Europe
those 240 hp and 161 lb of torque are to the wheel? if yes it is a very impresive numbers for a F20C NA engine without touching the engine


Juan
This is with Ultimate Lurker's Dynapack chassis dynamometer which attaches to the hubs, wheels/tires having been taken off.
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 05:11 PM
  #4  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally posted by S2000_Europe
those 240 hp and 161 lb of torque are to the wheel? if yes it is a very impresive numbers for a F20C NA engine without touching the engine


Juan
These are good numbers, but this is on a Dynapack, which would probably give a stock '00 about 210-215 RWHP.
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 05:16 PM
  #5  
SEVNT4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
From: Intercontinental
Default

Hey Al,

Looks great! On that graph, is the mugen header pulling 229 hp and 148 lb/tq and the plot with the 240 and 161 with Toda header? How much of that do you think was aided by the pulley?

How has the pulley system affected your accessories? Is that a non-issue for you since you track the car or do you still use A/C etc.... Would you recommend the pulley for a street driven car?

Again, great results!
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #6  
beroznikmal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 3
From: yes
Default

very impressive
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 05:30 PM
  #7  
Prolene's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,303
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

SEVNT4, UL did think they were good numbers, thanks, and I am glad there was no drop in performance. As Gernby added, stock might even be upwards of 215hp. The Mugen header was with the 229hp/148tq results.

With the pulleys, there can be a fair amount of mass spinning at 9000rpm or over, and this can take a bit of energy to do. The lightweight pulleys should have something to do with the increase, and not just the header.

Combined with a lighter flywheel, I find there is a tendency to have to give more gas, more clutch action when getting going from a stoplight, and if one can live with that, I would recommend lightweight pulleys. One can use the aftermarket pulleys with the A/C system.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 27, 2003 | 05:40 PM
  #8  
Sideways's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Wow,
That's a lot of torque. Love that 100 octane.
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #9  
SEVNT4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
From: Intercontinental
Default

Those are great numbers regardless. Sounds like you're ready for some 4.44 gears

Sideways, the space race is on! Al is one up on ya. Pull out the big guns already


[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prolene
[B]SEVNT4, UL did think they were good numbers, thanks, and I am glad there was no drop in performance.
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 06:48 PM
  #10  
vapors2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: Laguna
Default

good results
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 PM.