S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

aem stand alone question

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #21  
screaminyellow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, Cali'
Default

Originally Posted by MacGyver,Jul 7 2007, 03:37 AM
Your friend lost power so cams don't work?

Cams work fine, if you understand what they're doing for the engine and make the appropriate changes... slapping them on an engine and asking "where are my huge gains?" is naive. FI creates a LOT of flow, and with no understanding of where and when that flow happens is a surefire recipe to choking it off at the wrong time, hence a loss of power. Talk to g_s2k in Boston who is currently running 300 whp NA, partially due to cams.
300HP N/A? What the hell kind of set-up does he have? If this is at the wheels, then that is about a 110HP increase! I really want to know what he did.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #22  
batikan's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

no way to hit 300whp without stroking to at least 2.5
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #23  
BlownAP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Default

Originally Posted by batikan,Jul 7 2007, 03:06 PM
no way to hit 300whp without stroking to at least 2.5
there have been guys on the board to hit around 300 WHP with 2.1L...... stock stroke, bigger bores..
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #24  
batikan's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

i would really want to see the dyno sheet and the mod list for 300whp NA. what was the bore?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #25  
Quivers's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by screaminyellow,Jul 7 2007, 03:56 PM
300HP N/A? What the hell kind of set-up does he have? If this is at the wheels, then that is about a 110HP increase! I really want to know what he did.
Use the search button.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #26  
batikan's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Quivers,Jul 7 2007, 07:03 PM
Use the search button.
thanks for the help. i'm sure you always wanted to say that and thought this was the time.


i use the search button everytime before i ask something. you think i'm a newbie?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #27  
MacGyver's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,134
Likes: 3
From: Columbia, MD
Default

Yes, it is bored out and stroked... I want to say 2.2, but it could have been more. The point being it couldn't have been done without the help of cams... they were properly applied and more power was attained.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 06:32 AM
  #28  
batikan's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by MacGyver,Jul 8 2007, 09:04 AM
Yes, it is bored out and stroked... I want to say 2.2, but it could have been more. The point being it couldn't have been done without the help of cams... they were properly applied and more power was attained.
properly applied meaning properly tuned by aem?

btw, which cams were it? toda? skunk?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #29  
MacGyver's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,134
Likes: 3
From: Columbia, MD
Default

Any time the air/fuel mixture will be modified radically, particularly by something such as a cam, tuning becomes a necessity... in that particular case, an AEM was used. I do not know offhand which cams were used, but I know it's in his writeup.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #30  
gray65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Hi my question is along these lines, I am looking at a reworked throuttle body, they tell me I can get 4 hp more with it also have a aem v2 cool air in take. Is this true?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 PM.