S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Air Box Mods

Thread Tools
 
Old May 11, 2014 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
jeffcass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default Air Box Mods

Do you recommend removing the "L" shaped tunnel on the Air box lid? Do you recommend a hole in the side of the box and a Ram Air tube? If so, what size and location? 3 inch?; Beside radiator? Behind grill? In the hole in the fender well? anywhere else?? Besides removing inside wall and closing hole to resonator, What other Air box mods are worthwhile? Thanks for your input.
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 02:50 PM
  #2  
zeroptzero's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 29,848
Likes: 5,415
From: Ontario Canada
Default

I started by adding a snorkel onto the oem air box which fed cold air and no risk of hydrolock. I just added a vented hood and it has dropped the underhood temps by a big amount, the entire air box and intake arm is totally cold now.

The intake manifold temps have dropped from being very hot to just warm now. I'm really impressed with the changes, my intake air temps have dropped considerably and it doesn't take much speed to get the engine bay to cool down. Even the front of my valvecover is much cooler.

I would not remove the L-shaped duct on the oem air box lid as it channels air to the filter and it is a mandrel pipe without restriction.
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 02:51 PM
  #3  
dsthez's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Default

Pop the top off and call it a day. Aint gunna mattrr much. Has anyone actually tried a ram air intake straight to the engine with no air filter on any car? Seems like it wud almost be forced induction at 60mph or more?
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 04:35 PM
  #4  
starchland's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,336
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by JFUSION
I started by adding a snorkel onto the oem air box which fed cold air and no risk of hydrolock. I just added a vented hood and it has dropped the underhood temps by a big amount, the entire air box and intake arm is totally cold now.

The intake manifold temps have dropped from being very hot to just warm now. I'm really impressed with the changes, my intake air temps have dropped considerably and it doesn't take much speed to get the engine bay to cool down. Even the front of my valvecover is much cooler.

I would not remove the L-shaped duct on the oem air box lid as it channels air to the filter and it is a mandrel pipe without restriction.
Have you ever thought about relocating the iat sensor?
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 04:46 PM
  #5  
zeroptzero's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 29,848
Likes: 5,415
From: Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by starchland
Originally Posted by JFUSION' timestamp='1399848604' post='23154950
I started by adding a snorkel onto the oem air box which fed cold air and no risk of hydrolock. I just added a vented hood and it has dropped the underhood temps by a big amount, the entire air box and intake arm is totally cold now.

The intake manifold temps have dropped from being very hot to just warm now. I'm really impressed with the changes, my intake air temps have dropped considerably and it doesn't take much speed to get the engine bay to cool down. Even the front of my valvecover is much cooler.

I would not remove the L-shaped duct on the oem air box lid as it channels air to the filter and it is a mandrel pipe without restriction.
Have you ever thought about relocating the iat sensor?
Actually I have thought about it, but I never got around to doing anything about it.

I know on the ap1 the sensor is reading higher air temps due to heat captured by the intake manifold, but I wonder if it could it be giving more accurate readings in terms of fuel metering with it being closer to the intake ports ?. I think the ap1 sensor is reading accurately but it reads the air temps inside the intake manifold and those temps are always higher compared to incoming air at the air box.

Moving it to the intake arm like the ap2 setup will result in cooler temp readings that more accurately reflect the incoming air temp, but I'm not sure if that is more accurate or not when it comes to fuel metering ?. It is better for data logging intake temps though.

Just thinking out loud here.
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 07:00 PM
  #6  
MM3Kwolik's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 6
From: McKinney, TX
Default

Originally Posted by dsthez
Pop the top off and call it a day. Aint gunna mattrr much. Has anyone actually tried a ram air intake straight to the engine with no air filter on any car? Seems like it wud almost be forced induction at 60mph or more?

Popping the top off will only induce severe heat soak. I strongly do not advise doing this.....
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 09:54 PM
  #7  
arsenal's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 38
From: Portland
Default

Originally Posted by jordanksartell
Popping the top off will only induce severe heat soak. I strongly do not advise doing this.....
Mainly when in stop and go traffic. Once moving it's fine
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 12, 2014 | 05:04 AM
  #8  
jeffcass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

So should I remove the "L" shaped tunnel on the lid or not? What about "ram air" tube?
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 05:19 AM
  #9  
MM3Kwolik's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 6
From: McKinney, TX
Default

For the stock box, get a snorkel and line the box with heat tape and call it a day. Those are about the only improvements you can make to the stock box that will be worth your while.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 10:36 AM
  #10  
jeffcass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

What about removal of the inner partition and sealing up the resonator hole? Aren't these worthwhile mods?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 PM.