S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Alignment settings, less agressive

Thread Tools
 
Old May 23, 2004 | 02:25 PM
  #1  
j-co's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Default Alignment settings, less agressive

Hi all-

I did a search on this and didn't come up with exactly what I was looking for. I'm hoping someone can recommend for me some specs for a less-aggressive alignment. Specifically, I'm looking for a more daily/street oriented setup. I don't mind giving up dry weather performance (I run tires that won't even come close to giving me what the S-02s will anyways), in exchange for some greater stability in the wet and less aggressive tire wear (if that's an issue. I've had the car for a week )

Any suggestions?
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #2  
jguerdat's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY
Default

The stock alignment is fine. If you want, try the '04 alignment specs since they seem to be more sedan-like (less front negative camber, not sure about the rear)...
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #3  
hygiene boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Default

Tell them when you get it aligned what you want, they can set it to zero camber . . not negative, not positive. Keep everthing else to spec.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #4  
RazorV3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
Default

stay away from positive camber...
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #5  
j-co's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Default

But do I really want 0 camber? And are we talking front, rear, or both?

And what about rear toe settings? I think this would have the greatest effect on the two factors I mentioned, but I don't know where to go on this setting from where it is now.

Guys, I appreciate the help. This is the first car I've ever owned that's been said to be so profoundly affected by alignment settings so I'd love to adjust for the way I drive it and under the conditions I'd expect to face.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #6  
hygiene boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Default

The rear has more negative camber stock. You could always do just a little less negative camber than stock. Talk with the alignment shop and they'll give ya what you want.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #7  
Squeezer's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 1
From: Jackson
Default

i'd use stock settings. when you go with 0 camber you will have more understeer
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 24, 2004 | 12:37 AM
  #8  
RACER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,082
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally posted by hygiene boy
The rear has more negative camber stock. You could always do just a little less negative camber than stock. Talk with the alignment shop and they'll give ya what you want.


Set the caster and toe settings to factory spec. The rears are toed in to make the back of the car stable. Do NOT set the rear toe to other than factory spec.
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 06:45 AM
  #9  
natedoggs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville
Default



My toe is out of wack, and it's messing up the tires (excessive wearing/cuts on tires) and handling. I'm getting it aligned this week.
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #10  
RazorV3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
Default

does anyone have the exact alignment settings for a USDM 2003 s2000(front/rear camber, toe, caster)? i know they changed them a couple times throughout the years.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 AM.